Theoretical Construction and Critique of Structuralist Human Geography: Development Context, Academic Contributions, and Contemporary Reflections

Chunyan Liang

doi:10.62051/ijsspa.v7n3.05

Authors

Chunyan Liang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62051/ijsspa.v7n3.05

Keywords:

Structuralism; Production of Space, Capitalist Spatial Logic, Urban Political Economy, Theoretical Limitations

Abstract

Structuralist human geography emerging between the 1960s and 1980s, its theoretical foundations stem from the interdisciplinary integration of linguistics, anthropology, and Marxism, emphasizing the revelation of deep-seated social structures and power relations behind spatial phenomena from holistic and systematic perspectives. The school has propelled geography from descriptive to explanatory research, introducing core theories such as “production of space,” “capitalist spatial logic,” and “urban political economy analysis”, providing critical perspectives for understanding socio-spatial relations. However, its tendency toward structural determinism and economic reductionism limits its ability to explain individual agency and new social phenomena. Nevertheless, the theoretical legacy of structuralism remains relevant in critiques of neoliberal urbanization and environmental geography, continuously expanding its scope of application through integration with other theories. This paper explores the developmental context, academic contributions, and limitations of structuralist human geography.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] YAMAN X, YANPING Y. “A Comparative Research on Linguistic Thoughts of Saussure and Baudouin”, Journal of Sichuan University ( Philosophy and Social Science Edition), Vol. pp. 102-11, 2021.

[2] YUANYUAN Y. “Exploring the significance of Saussure’s Structural Linguistics for Chinese International Education”, JOURNAL OF LUCHENG, Vol. pp. 56-8, 2024.

[3] QINGFENG W, WEIJIE L. “Subject Status in Structuralism From :Ssussure to Levi-Strauss”, JOURNAL OF QINGHAI NATIONALITIES UNIVERSITY, Vol. 45, pp. 143-8, 2019.

[4] FANKE W. “Arbitrary ”arbitrariness” - A Discrimination between Benjamin’s Early Philosophy of Language and Saussure’s Structuralist Linguistics”, Chinese Book Review, Vol. pp. 65-71, 2023.

[5] TINGTING W. “Exploration and Research on Saussure’s Philosophy of Language”, Journal of Lvliang Education Institute, Vol. 40, pp. 44-6, 2023.

[6] QINGXIONG Z. “Language and Structuralist Methodology:An Investigation with Saussureas the Starting Point”, The Social Science, Vol. pp. 111-22, 2020.

[7] JIAN H. “Philosophical Interpretations of Saussure’s Language Theory --From the Perspective ofAnalytic Philosophy”, Journal of Xinjiang University(Philosophy,Humanities & Social Science), Vol. 49, pp. 143-9, 2021.

[8] LINGJUN W. “The Signifier Comes First--Levi-Strauss’s inheritance and development of Saussure’s referential/signifying theory”, Culture Journal, Vol. pp. 197-200, 2023.

[9] CHI M. “On Scientism and Maxism of Althuser’s Structuralism”, Journal of Gansu Lianhe University (Social Sciences), Vol. pp. 1-7, 2005.

[10] YAN Y. “Humanitarianism or Structuralism--Schaf’s Critique of Althusser’s Structuralist Marxism”, Marxism and Reality, Vol. pp. 100-6, 2019.

[11] YISHI Z. “Analysis of the Structuralist Marxist View on the Driving Forces of Social Development: A Case Study of Althusser”, Heilongjiang Social Sciences, Vol. pp. 1-6+2, 2013.

[12] T.STRONG, SHENGHUA C. “Review of ”The Structure of Althusser’s Works: Marxism of the Ideology””, The Foreign social sciences, Vol. pp. 71-2, 1986.

[13] ZHOUFEI P, JIAYI L. “The Probe to the View of the System of Althusser’s Structuralism Marxism”, JOURNAL OF SYSTEMS SCIENCE, Vol. 20, pp. 16-9+41, 2012.

[14] FURONG B. “On Structuralism and Marxism: A Case Study of Althusser”, THEOＲETICAL INVESTIGATION, Vol. pp. 63-8, 2017.

[15] JUNDA X. “Comment on Althusser’s structuralist approach to studying Marxism”, Jinyang Academic Journal, Vol. pp. 26-30, 1985.

[16] JINHUI L. “Dialectic Between Structure and History ---On Althusser’s Structuralism Marxism”, THE NORTHERN FORUM, Vol. pp. 128-31, 2005.

[17] LIANG M, WEIGANG S. “Comment on the Structural Marxism of Althusser”, JOURNAL OF NINGBO COLLEGE, Vol. pp. 1-5, 2002.

[18] QINGJUN W. “Structuralist and Empiricist Institutional Research and Their Transition:A review of the theories of industrial relations in Europe and American”, The Study of Sociology, Vol. 30, pp. 196-221+46, 2015.

[19] SHIXING Z, YUN H. “From Culturlism to Structural Marxism: Studies on Birmingham School Early Theoretical Path”, Nanjing Social Sciences, Vol. pp. 40-7, 2016.

[20] PEIYUN S. “The internal logic of the transformation of the research paradigm of British cultural Marxism and its contemporary value”, SHANDONG SOCIAL SCIENCES, Vol. pp. 82-9+192, 2024.

[21] YUNLONG C, CHAO Y, BARNES T, et al. “Marxist geography and its development in China: Reflections on planning and practice”, GEOGRAPHICAL RESEARCH, Vol. 35, pp. 1399-419, 2016.

[22] JUNPENG L, DONGMENG W. “Structuralist Approaches in Historical Sociology”, Journal of Nanjing Normal University (Social Sciences Edition), Vol. pp. 123-40, 2024.

[23] XIAOZHONG Y, DONGHUA L, JIANFENG H, et al. “Conceptual framework and research perspectives of route tourism destinations”, ACTA GEOGRAPHICA SINICA, Vol. 78, pp. 2939-57, 2023.

[24] YUNGANG L, FENGLONG W. “REEXAMINING CHINESE HUMAN GEOGRAPHY: PERSPECTIVE OF THEORETICAL STUDIES IN RECENT THIRTY YEARS”, Human Geography, Vol. 28, pp. 14-9, 2013.

[25] YUNLONG C. “THE POSITIVIST METHODOLOGY IN GEOGRAPHY--REVIEW OF D.HARVEY(1969), EXPLANATION IN GEOGRAPHY”, Geographical Research, Vol. pp. 95-104, 1990.

[26] JUN S, YUJUN P, WEIREN H, et al. “THE SIGNIFICANCE OF HUMANISTIC GEOGRAPHY IN THE CHANGING HUMANISTIC TRADITION OF GEOGRAPHY”, Human Geography, Vol. 30, pp. 1-8+39, 2015.

[27] YANG Y, YANGANG F, LU L. “Progress and prospects of rural settlement landscape research from the perspective of human geography methodology”, Progress in Geography, Vol. 43, pp. 163-78, 2024.

[28] XIAOGUO X, JIANQIANG L. “Distortion of ”History-Geographical Materialism”：Limitations of Space Theory at the Perspective of Positivism Geography by D.Harvey”, JOURNAL OF SJTU(Philosophy and Social Sciences), Vol. 24, pp. 36-44, 2016.

[29] HONGTAO W. “Ethical Realm of Modern Geographical Science and David Harvey’s Spatial Theory”, JOURNAL OF DIALECTICS OF NATURE, Vol. 36, pp. 105-9+28, 2014.

[30] WUJIE L. “Reflection on Geography from a Marxism Perspective: Book Review on Divid Harvey’s Social Justice and the City”, Journal of Hefei University( Social Sciences), Vol. 30, pp. 98-101, 2013.

[31] YUNLONG C, CHAO Y, LAURENCE M, et al. “Knowledge as action: Marxist geography and its development in China”, GEOGRAPHICAL RESEARCH, Vol. 35, pp. 1205-29, 2016.

[32] SHEN L, CHAO Y. “Toward Marxist geography: Exploring the nature of urbanism and justice: A review on David Harvey’sSocial Justice and the City”, Progress in Geography, Vol. 41, pp. 1979-90, 2022.

[33] XIAOFENG T. “Harvey’s urban space”, READING, Vol. pp. 140-6, 2010.

[34] JIA Y. “David Harvey: From Geographer to Flag-bearer of New Marxism”, Gansu Social Sciences, Vol. pp. 92-5, 2013.

[35] MEEGAN R. “Doreen Massey (1944-2016): a geographer who really mattered”, REGIONAL STUDIES, Vol. 51, pp. 1285-96, 2017.

[36] DELANEY D, RANNILA P. “Scopic relations as spatial relations”, Progress in Human Geography, Vol. 45, pp. 030913252093675, 2020.

[37] MASSEY D, GROUP H G R, BOND S, et al. “The Possibilities of a Politics of Place Beyond Place? A Conversation with Doreen Massey”, Scottish Geographical Journal, Vol. 125, pp. 401-20, 2009.

[38] CHANGHONG M. “WESTERN ECONOMIC GEOGRAPHY IN TRANSFORMATION: INSITITUTIONALCULTURALRELATIONAL AND SCALAR TURNS”, HUMAN GEOGRAPHY, Vol. pp. 68-76, 2004.

[39] XIAOFENG T, PING L. “The Cultural Turn and Postmodernist Geography: An Introduction to Chapter 8 of Johnston’s New Edition of Geography and the Geographer”, HUMAN GEOGRAPHY, Vol. pp. 79-80, 2000.

[40] ZHONGWEI S, YANG W, JIANWEN T. “Turns of Geography Space Research:From Natural Space to Social Space and Realistic Space to Virtual Space”, Geography and Geo-Information Science, Vol. 30, pp. 112-6, 2014.

[41] XIAOJIAN L, QING L. “A Review on Relational Turn in Economic Geography”, WORLD REGIONAL STUDIES, Vol. pp. 19-27, 2007.

[42] HONG Z, QUAN G. “Review on ”emotional turn” and emotional geographies in recent western geography”, GEOGRAPHICAL RESEARCH, Vol. 34, pp. 1394-406, 2015.

[43] XUESONG H. “Space, Power and Knowledge: Foucault’s Geographical Turn”, Journal of Xuehai, Vol. pp. 44-8, 2005.

[44] LACHANG L, YEHUA W. “INSTITUTIONAL TURNINSTITUTIONAL THICKNESS OF NEW ECONOMIC GEOGRAPHY AND REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT”, ECONOMIC GEOGRAPHY, Vol. pp. 437-41, 2005.

[45] QINLU X. “From Spatial Shift to Spatial Mediation: The Rise and Development of Media Geography in the West”, Modern Communication (Journal of Communication University of China), Vol. 40, pp. 75-81, 2018.

[46] XUEMING L, JIANHONG L. “Cultural Turning in Physical Geography”, PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, Vol. 29, pp. 740-6, 2010.

[47] YIBING Z. “Criticism and reflection on the issues of capitalist cities ---An interpretation of Lefebvre’s The urban revolution”, Dong Yue Tribune, Vol. pp. 170-81+92, 2025.

[48] YAN L. “On Lefebvre’s Ecological Criticism of Capitalist Spatial Production and Its Implications”, Marxist Philosophy, Vol. pp. 139-46, 2024.

[49] QINGXIA L, JITING Y. “David Harvey on the Logic of Capital and the Three Dimensions of Capitalist Crisis”, Seeking Truth, Vol. 49, pp. 25-32, 2022.

[50] WEIXUAN S. “A Review on Gentrification in European and North American Countries”, PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, Vol. 31, pp. 825-34, 2012.

[51] JUNWEI N, HUAIYU L. “On the Spatio-temporal Diagnosis of Modern Society by Giddens, Harvey and Castors”, SHANDONG SOCIAL SCIENCES, Vol. pp. 24-9, 2012.