Research on the Formation Mechanism and Mitigation Pathway of AI Cognitive Dependence in Education Context: A Cognitive Ecology Perspective

Pan Zhang; Yingtian Xiao

doi:10.62051/ijsspa.v9n2.10

Authors

Pan Zhang
Yingtian Xiao

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62051/ijsspa.v9n2.10

Keywords:

Generative Artificial Intelligence, Cognitive Dependence, Cognitive Ecology, Human-Computer Collaboration, Cognitive Augmentation

Abstract

The deep integration of generative artificial intelligence (AI) into the field of education expands the cognitive boundaries of subjects and improves cognitive efficiency, while potentially triggering the risk of cognitive dependence and leading to the alienation of educational values. This paper elaborates on the conceptual connotation, alienation manifestations, and potential value crisis of AI cognitive dependence in the educational context. From the perspective of cognitive ecology, a theoretical framework is constructed encompassing four dimensions-cognitive subject, technological intermediary, cognitive environment, and educational crisis-to reveal the systematic structure, dynamics, and evolutionary mechanisms of AI cognitive dependence formation. Feasible pathways to mitigate AI cognitive dependence are proposed from five aspects: technology regulation, subject empowerment, cognitive reshaping, ecological governance, and value reconstruction. Specifically, establish an ethical regulatory system for AI educational applications through data, algorithms, and scenarios; construct an effective "human-in-the-loop" mechanism and refined human-machine cognitive division of labor strategies to strengthen human cognitive dominance; restore the imbalance of cognitive structure through embodied experience enhancement and metacognitive training; implement cognitive diversity protection and ecological niche optimization strategies to maintain the resilience of the cognitive system; reaffirm the unique value of human cognition through value reconstruction and establish a cognitive perspective of "human-computer co-evolution". This paper aims to emphasize the transcendence of educational value rationality over AI instrumental rationality, realize AI's role in promoting "cognitive enhancement rather than replacement" for subjects, construct a new cognitive ecosystem of "human-computer symbiosis", and provide early warnings and practical guidance for ethical governance in the process of educational digitalization.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] HUANG Ronghuai. Artificial Intelligence is Accelerating Educational Transformation: Practical Challenges and Countermeasures[J]. Journal of the Chinese Society of Education, 2023(6):26-33.

[2] YU Shengquan, WANG Fancong. The Cognitive Outsourcing Trap of AI Educational Applications and Its Transcendence[J]. E-education Research, 2023,44(12):5-13.

[3] SUN Weiping. Artificial Intelligence and the "New Alienation" of Humans[J]. Social Sciences in China, 2020(12):119-137,202-203.

[4] WEI Nengyuan. The Educational Trap of Cognitive Outsourcing in the Digital Intelligence Era and Its Transcendence[J]. Open Education Research, 2025,31(1):53-60.

[5] LEE H P H, SARKAR A, TANKELEVITCH L, et al. The Impact of Generative AI on Critical Thinking: Self-Reported Reductions in Cognitive Effort and Confidence Effects from a Survey of Knowledge Workers[EB/OL]. 2021(2): 36-38

[6] YANG Yanjun, ZHANG Jiahui, TONG Hui. Multidisciplinary Analysis and Integrative Interpretation of Digital Media Technology Dependence[J]. E-education Research, 2020,41(8):26-32.

[7] SALOMON G. Television is "Easy" and Print is "Tough": The Differential Investment of Mental Effort in Learning as a Function of Perceptions and Attributions[J]. Journal of Educational Psychology, 1984,76(4):647-658.

[8] BRONCANO-BERROCAL F, VEGA-ENCABO J. A Taxonomy of Types of Epistemic Dependence: Introduction to the Synthese Special Issue on Epistemic Dependence[J]. Synthese, 2020,197(7):2745-2763.

[9] ZHANG Jiacheng, SHEN Yang. Research on the Multidimensional Impacts and Coping Strategies of AI Cognitive Dependence[J]. New Media and Society, 2024(2):38-48,401.

[10] WU Nanzhong, CHEN Xianzhang, FENG Yong. From "Disorder" to "Order": The Turn and Generation Mechanism of Generative Artificial Intelligence Educational Applications[J]. Journal of Distance Education, 2023,41(6):42-51.

[11] ZHANG Zheng, LIU Chenxu. Large Model Hallucinations: Cognitive Risks and Co-Governance Possibilities in Human-Machine Communication[J]. Journal of Soochow University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2024,45(5):171-180.

[12] YANG Zongkai, WANG Jun, WU Di, et al. An Analysis of the Impact of Generative Artificial Intelligence such as ChatGPT on Education and Its Coping Strategies[J]. Journal of East China Normal University (Educational Sciences Edition), 2023,41(7):26-35.

[13] ZHANG Li, ZHOU Lin, ZHAO Leilei. Risks and Avoidance of Generative Artificial Intelligence Educational Applications-Based on the Perspective of Educational Subjectivity[J]. Open Education Research, 2023,29(5):47-53.

[14] HU X G, XU S, TONG R, et al. Generative AI in Education: From Foundational Insights to the Socratic Playground for Learning[EB/OL]. 2020, 14(1): 44-48

[15] LIU Xiaofeng, ZHANG Jinlin. A Three-Dimensional Exploration of the Impact of Generative Artificial Intelligence on Ideological and Political Education in Colleges and Universities[J]. Journal of National Academy of Education Administration, 2023(12):66-75.

[16] GU Fei. Cognitive Enhancement AI and Educational Symbiosis: A New Ecosystem of Future Education[J]. Open Education Research, 2024,30(6):13-20.

[17] YU Shengquan. Transcending the Cognitive Outsourcing Trap of Artificial Intelligence Educational Applications[J]. Journal of the Chinese Society of Education, 2025(4):1.

[18] LIN Ying, XIE Hangping. How to Move Emotions: The Logic of Intersubjectivity and the New Approach of "Human-Object" Epistemology in the Age of Artificial Intelligence[J]. Journal of Fujian Normal University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2024(4):99-110.

[19] HE Wei. Ethical Risks of Generative Artificial Intelligence Technology and Responsible Innovation Governance Research[J]. World Sci-Tech R & D, 2024,46(4):548-559.

[20] SU Linmeng, ZHU Ke, JING Xiaorui. Digital Literacy Education of Normal University Students from the Perspective of Phenomenology: Logical Connotation, Realistic Dilemmas and Practical Paths[J]. E-education Research, 2025,46(5):12-18.

[21] HUTCHINS E. Cognitive Ecology[J]. Topics in Cognitive Science, 2010,2(4):705-715.

[22] XIAO Fuyun. The Internal Mechanism, Risk Challenges and Countermeasures of Artificial Intelligence-Driven Teaching Reform of Ideological and Political Theory Courses in Colleges and Universities[J]. E-education Research, 2025,46(5):103-107,115.

[23] LYU Jinjiao, LIU Meifeng, SHI Lifan, et al. The Development Vein and Application Analysis of Activity Theory[J]. Modern Educational Technology, 2007,17(1):8-14.

[24] WANG Tianmin, ZHENG Lili. The Formation Mechanism and Governance Path of "Information Cocoons" in Intelligent Ideological and Political Education[J]. Journal of Guizhou Normal University (Social Sciences Edition), 2023(5):30-42.

[25] QI Chenhang. The Characteristics of False Information Risks of Generative Artificial Intelligence and Its Governance Paths[J]. Information Studies: Theory & Application, 2024,47(3):112-120.

[26] HONG Ling. The Disembodied Dilemma and Practical Paths of Knowledge Learning in the Context of Generative Artificial Intelligence[J]. E-education Research, 2025,46(5):19-25.

[27] HAN Min, ZHAO Haiming. The Subversion and Reconstruction of Physical Subjectivity in the Intelligent Era-On the Intersubjectivity between Humans and Artificial Intelligence[J]. Journal of Southwest Minzu University (Humanities and Social Sciences Edition), 2020,41(5):56-63.

[28] SHEN Yang, YAN Jiaqi, ZOU Kaiyuan. Human-Machine Collaborative Knowledge Production Based on DeepSeek Chain of Thought[J]. Chinese Editors Journal, 2025(4):95-100.

[29] LI Xu. The Principles, Methods and Applications of Social System Dynamics Policy Research[M]. Shanghai: Fudan University Press, 2009.

[30] GAHRN-ANDERSEN R. Informational Resilience in the Human Cognitive Ecology[J]. Entropy, 2023,25(9):1247.

[31] MAO Haidong. How Can Technology Regulate?-Conceptual Justification and Significance Exploration of Technology Regulation[J]. Zhejiang Academic Journal, 2024(6):57-65.

[32] LIU Mingda, CHEN Zuoning, SHI Yijuan, et al. Research Progress of Blockchain in the Field of Data Security[J]. Chinese Journal of Computers, 2021,44(1):1-27.

[33] WANG Shulan, QIU Yao, ZHAO Chenbin, et al. eDPRF: An Efficient Differentially Private Random Forest Training Algorithm[J]. Journal of Software, 2025,36(7):2929-2946.

[34] DOU Hui, ZHANG Lingming, HAN Feng, et al. A Survey on the Interpretability of Convolutional Neural Networks[J]. Journal of Software, 2024,35(1):159-184.

[35] HUANG Ronghuai. The Integration of Large Artificial Intelligence Models into Education: Conceptual Transformation, Form Reshaping and Key Measures[J]. People's Tribune · Academic Frontiers, 2024(14):23-30.

[36] QIAO Xuefeng, ZHAO Hua, GAO Xiaojuan, et al. The Framework Construction and Cultivation Paths of Artificial Intelligence Literacy in Primary and Secondary Schools in the Digital Intelligence Era[J]. Journal of Tianjin Normal University (Elementary Education Edition), 2025,26(6):13-18.

[37] WANG Fancong, TANG Xiaoyu, YU Shengquan. Cognitive Outsourcing Based on Generative Artificial Intelligence: Analysis of Interactive Behavior Patterns and Cognitive Structure Characteristics[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2025,57(6):967-986.

[38] YAN Junzi, ZHANG Jiajun. The Physical Existence of Learners in the Digital Intelligence Era: Ought, Reality and How[J]. E-education Research, 2025,46(8):40-46.

[39] WANG Tianjian. An Analysis of the Rationality of Education Returning to Nature in the Era of Generative Artificial Intelligence-Based on the Discussion of Innate Cognitive Perspective[J]. China Educational Technology, 2024(11):13-20.

[40] QIAO Xuefeng. From Tool Empowerment to Intelligent Collaboration: The Transformation of Educational Models Driven by Generative Artificial Intelligence[J]. Social Sciences in Nanjing, 2025(1):126-134.