Platform Oligopoly and Data Feudalization under the Perspective of Technological Sovereignty
Research on the Realization of Socialist Public Ownership
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62051/ijsspa.v9n2.15Keywords:
Technological Sovereignty, Platform Oligopoly, Data Feudalization, Marxist Monopoly Theory, Socialist Public OwnershipAbstract
As a core element in safeguarding national sovereignty, "technological sovereignty" has evolved into technological feudalism through its exclusivity in the digital era, specifically manifested as a market pattern of platform oligopolies. Data feudalization serves as the hallmark feature of this phenomenon. Grounded in Marxist monopoly theory and technological sovereignty, this paper systematically analyzes the formation mechanisms of platform oligopoly and the typical characteristics of "data feudalization," exploring their challenges and implications for realizing socialist public ownership in the digital economy. The study reveals that platform capital constructs new monopolistic forms through data possession, algorithmic control, and ecosystem closure - essentially perpetuating the logic of capital expansion. Meanwhile, "data feudalization" exacerbates digital economy inequality via data privatization and labor alienation. From an international comparative perspective, this paper proposes transforming platform economies from commercial market logic to social logic through socialist ownership-based approaches: market-oriented allocation of data elements, public ownership of digital infrastructure, and innovation in antitrust legal frameworks. This transformation ultimately achieves a dynamic equilibrium between technological sovereignty and public interests.
Downloads
References
[1] Marx, K. (2004) Capital(Volume III). People's Publishing House, Beijing.
[2] Bureau of Compilation and Translation. (2012) Selected Works of Lenin(Volume II). People's Publishing House, Beijing.
[3] Durand, C. (2024) Technological Feudalism. Renmin University of China Press, Beijing.
[4] Harrison, S. (2021) Digital Feudalism: Sharecropping, Ground Rent, and Tribute. Rethinking Marxism, 33: 21-25.
[5] Wei X. (2021) Value Production, Measurement, and Distribution under Digital Capitalism-A Critique of the 'Theory of the Failure of the Law of Value . Marxism Studies, 2: 15-16.
[6] Joel K. (2020) The Coming of Neo-feudalism: A Warning to the Global Middle Class. New York: Encounter Books, 14:118.
[7] Hu Y. (2023) Critique of American Digital Hegemony from the Perspective of Digital Imperialism. Marxism Studies, 11:16-18.
[8] Srnicek, N. (2018) Platform Capitalism. Guangdong People's Publishing House, Guangzhou.
[9] Harvey, D. (2009) The New Imperialism. Social Sciences Academic Press, Beijing.
[10] Bureau of Compilation and Translation. (2009) Collected Works of Marx and Engels, People's Publishing House, Beijing.
[11] Jensen, J.L. (2020) The Medieval Internet: Power, Politics and Participation in the Digital Age. Emerald Publishing Limited, Bingley.
[12] Mazzucato, M. (2019) Preventing Digital Feudalism. Project Syndicate, 15:39-41.
[13] Jiang, L. (2024) How to Think About Global Digital Capitalism?-Philosophical Reflections under Contemporary Social Critical Theory. Shanghai People's Publishing House, Shanghai.
[14] Sadowsky, J. (2022) Superintelligence. Translated by Xu Q. Chinese Translation Publishing House, Beijing.
[15] Bureau of Compilation and Translation. (2009) Collected Works of Marx and Engels. People's Publishing House, Beijing.
[16] Nick, S. (2018) Platform Capitalism. Translated by Cheng S. Guangdong People's Publishing House, GuangZhou.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 International Journal of Social Sciences and Public Administration

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.






