The Dual Impact of Trade Wars on Emerging Market Economies: A Study on the Link between Economic Growth Volatility and Global Influence
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62051/ijsspa.v9n2.19Keywords:
Trade War, Emerging Market Economies, Economic Volatility, Global InfluenceAbstract
This study examines the impact of the US–China trade war on emerging market economies (EMEs), with a specific focus on how it has exacerbated economic growth volatility and shaped strategic positioning. Using a mixed-methods approach, we construct two composite indices-the Economic Volatility Index and the Global Influence Index-via principal component analysis (PCA), drawing on data from five representative EMEs (Brazil, India, South Africa, Turkey, and Vietnam) between 2013 and 2021. We identify a moderate negative correlation between global influence and economic volatility at the aggregate level, yet country-level analysis unveils substantial heterogeneity: nations with greater influence exhibited milder volatility, whereas less influential economies experienced intensified instability. After the trade war, driven by national heterogeneity, the divergence trend among different countries has become further pronounced. These findings underscore the dual role of the trade war as both an economic disruptor and a strategic catalyst, highlighting how domestic policies and economic structures mediate its effects. This study offers novel insights into the resilience and adaptive strategies of EMEs in an era of great-power competition.
Downloads
References
[1] Bartak, J., Jabłoński, Ł., & Jastrzębska, A. (2021). Examining GDP Growth and Its Volatility: An Episodic Approach. Entropy, 23(7), 890. https://doi.org/10.3390/e23070890
[2] Bhowmik, R., & Wang, S. (2020). Stock Market Volatility and Return Analysis: A Systematic Literature Review. Entropy, 22(5), 522. https://doi.org/10.3390/e22050522
[3] Bishnoi, V. (2019). Make in India initiative: A key for sustainable growth. South Asian Journal of Marketing & Management Research, 9(3), 21. https://doi.org/10.5958/2249-877x.2019.00013.4
[4] Brainard, L., & Martinez-Diaz, L. (2009). Brazil as an Economic Superpower?: Understanding Brazil’s Changing Role in the Global Economy. Brookings Institution Press.
[5] Braveboy-Wagner, J. (2016). Diplomatic Strategies of Nations in the Global South The Search for Leadership. New York Palgrave Macmillan Us :Imprint: Palgrave Macmillan.
[6] Chea, A. C. (2023). Global Marketing: Emerging Market Economies’ Challenges, Opportunities and Effective Marketing Strategy for Success. Business and Economic Research, 13(4), 103–103. https://doi.org/10.5296/ber.v13i4.21482
[7] Chen, G., Dong, X., Minford, P., Qiu, G., Xu, Y., & Xu, Z. (2021). Computable General Equilibrium Models of Trade in the Modern Trade Policy Debate. Open Economies Review, 33(2), 271–309. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11079-021-09631-9
[8] Chen, Z. (2022). Research on International Trade Theory and the Status Quo of World International Trade. American Journal of Industrial and Business Management, 12(6), 1079–1087. https://doi.org/10.4236/ajibm.2022.126057
[9] Cheptiş, A. (2022). The impact of external shocks on economic growth: An empirical study based on the SVAR models. Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence, 16(1), 650–659. https://doi.org/10.2478/picbe-2022-0062
[10] Choi, B. Y., & Nguyen, T. L. (2023). Trade diversion effects of the US–China trade war on Vietnam. Pacific Economic Review, 28(4), 570–588. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0106.12435
[11] Chunga, J. P., & Yu, P. (2024). The impact of external shocks on volatility persistence and market efficiency of the foreign exchange rate regime: evidence from Malawi. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-03957-8
[12] Ibrahim, S. G., Ahmet, A., & Sheriff , A. I. (2021). China and the Future of Africa Continental Free Trade Area (ACFTR): Challenges and Opportunities - African Journal of Economics and Sustainable Development (AJESD). African Journal of Economics and Sustainable Development, 4(3). http://dx.doi.org/10.52589/AJESD-OVPKTDUY
[13] Jena, D., Akash, C., & Gupta, P. (2024). Deflecting economic sanctions: do trade and political alliances matter? International Economics and Economic Policy, 21(3), 543–567. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10368-024-00616-w
[14] Jolliffe, I. T., & Cadima, J. (2016). Principal component analysis: a review and recent developments. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 374(2065), 20150202. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2015.0202
[15] Kapustina, L., Lipková, Ľ., Silin, Y., & Drevalev, A. (2020). US-China Trade War: Causes and Outcomes. SHS Web of Conferences, 73(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20207301012
[16] Khurshid, I. (2023). Modi’s US Foreign Policy: Strategic Autonomy Redefined. Journal of Asian and African Studies, 60(1), 002190962311733-002190962311733. https://doi.org/10.1177/00219096231173395
[17] Kvangraven, I. H. (2023). Dependency theory: strengths, weaknesses, and its relevance today. In : A Modern Guide to Uneven Economic Development (pp. 147–170). Edward Elgar Publishing eBooks. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781788976541.00013
[18] Lowy Institute. (n.d.). Global Diplomacy Index. Https://Globaldiplomacyindex.lowyinstitute.org. https://globaldiplomacyindex.lowyinstitute.org/
[19] Maćkowiak, B. (2007). External shocks, U.S. monetary policy and macroeconomic fluctuations in emerging markets. Journal of Monetary Economics, 54(8), 2512–2520. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmoneco.2007.06.021
[20] Namkoong, Y. (1999). Dependency Theory: Concepts, Classifications, and Criticisms. International Area Review, 2(1), 121–150. https://doi.org/10.1177/223386599900200106
[21] Putnam, R. D. (1988). Diplomacy and Domestic Politics: The Logic of Two-Level Games. International Organization, 42(3), 427–460.
[22] Ripsman, N. M. (2021). Globalization, deglobalization and Great Power politics. International Affairs, 97(5), 1317–1333. https://doi.org/10.1093/ia/iiab091
[23] Sakarya, B. =, Polat, O., & Ertuğrul, H. M. (2025). Revisiting inflation inertia: A comprehensive analysis of dynamics and connectedness in the Turkish case. Central Bank Review, 25(2), 100199–100199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cbrev.2025.100199
[24] Tian, Y. (2023). The Trend of China-US Strategic Competition and Chinese Domestic Public Opinion about Sino-US Relations from Trump to Biden. Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media, 6(1), 986–993. https://doi.org/10.54254/2753-7048/6/20220946
[25] Turhan, E. (2025). Turkey as a “Geopolitical Other”: The Construction of European Identities in the Geopolitical Era and its Implications for EU–Turkey Relations. European Journal of Risk Regulation, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1017/err.2025.10028
[26] United Nations Peacekeeping. (n.d.). Troop and police contributors. United Nations Peacekeeping. https://peacekeeping.un.org/en/troop-and-police-contributors
[27] Voeten, E., Strezhnev, A., & Bailey, M. (2009). United Nations General Assembly Voting Data. Harvard Dataverse. https://doi.org/10.7910/dvn/lejuqz
[28] Wang, Y., & Laufer, D. (2024). A cross-disciplinary review of crisis spillover research: Spillover types, risk factors, and response strategies. Public Relations Review, 50(3), 102411. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2023.102411
[29] Winkler, S. C. (2023). Strategic Competition and US–China Relations: A Conceptual Analysis. The Chinese Journal of International Politics, 16(3). https://doi.org/10.1093/cjip/poad008
[30] Word Bank. (n.d.). Global Financial Development | DataBank. Databank.worldbank.org. https://databank.worldbank.org/source/global-financial-development
[31] World Bank. (n.d.). World Development Indicators. The World Bank. https://databank.worldbank.org/source/world-development-indicators
[32] Zhang, W.-B. (2008). International trade theory : capital, knowledge, economic structure, money, and prices over time. Springer.
[33] Zhao, M. (2025). Geopolitical Impacts of China’s Belt and Road Initiative: Opportunities and Risks Across Asia, Africa, and Europe. Advances in Economics Management and Political Sciences, 164(1), 118–127. https://doi.org/10.54254/2754-1169/2025.20735
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 International Journal of Social Sciences and Public Administration
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
