Governing Cyberviolence in China: Limitations of the Cyberviolence Information Governance Provisions

Yuxuan Zhao

doi:10.62051/ijsspa.v10n2.04

Authors

Yuxuan Zhao

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62051/ijsspa.v10n2.04

Keywords:

Cyberviolence, Cyberviolence Information, Online Speech, Overcriminalization, Privatization of Regulation

Abstract

Cyberviolence, as a side effect of increasing internet penetration, is now prevalent worldwide. To combat the risks and acts of cyberviolence, in 2024, the Chinese government implemented its special regulation over ‘cyberviolence information’. These new ‘Provisions’ not only constitute an important part of the Chinese cybersecurity framework but also advance it from a reactive model to a proactive model, from governing behaviours to governing information. More notably, it greatly expands platforms’ role in cyber governance and empowers them to carry out content moderation and manage user accounts. However, ‘cyberviolence information’ is too broad and inaccurate of a legal concept to be used for censoring online speech and over-criminalizing legitimate communication. The strategy of ‘privatization of regulation’ and the empowered ‘digital Leviathan’ also pose severe threats to future Chinese development of the rule of law and democracy.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Awiria O, Olweus D and Byrne B. Bullying at school-What we know and what we can do [J]. British Journal of Educational Studies, 1994, 42(4): 403-406.

[2] Smith P K, Mahdavi J, Carvalho M, et al. Cyberbullying: Its nature and impact in secondary school pupils [J]. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, and Allied Disciplines, 2008, 49(4): 376-385.

[3] Menesini E, Nocentini A. Cyberbullying definition and measurement: Some critical considerations [J]. Zeitschrift für Psychologie/Journal of Psychology, 2009, 217(4): 230-232.

[4] Peter I K, Petermann F. Cyberbullying: A concept analysis of defining attributes and additional influencing factors [J]. Computers in Human Behavior, 2018, 86: 350-366.

[5] Xie Dengke. Public-private collaborative governance model for cyber violence crimes [J]. Science of Law (Journal of Northwest University of Political Science and Law), 2023, 41(5): 92-101.

[6] Xu Youping. The invisible aggressive fist: Features of cyberbullying language in China [J]. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law-Revue internationale de Semiotique juridique, 2021, 34(4): 1041-1064.

[7] Adediran A O. Cyberbullying in Nigeria: Examining the adequacy of legal responses [J]. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law-Revue internationale juridique, 2021, 34(4): 965-984.

[8] Lovelock M. Catching a catfish: Constructing the good social media user in reality television [J]. Television& New Media, 2016, 17(4): 203-217.

[9] Zhao Hong. The connection between civil execution responsibility and integration in cyber violence cases [J]. Northern Legal Science, 2023, 17(5): 5-20.

[10] Hassan F M, Khamis A, Ewis A. Cyber violence pattern and related factors: Online survey of females in Egypt [J]. Egyptian Journal of Forensic Sciences, 2020, 10(6): 1-7.

[11] Volodina v. Russia(No. 2), No. 40419/19, ECHR. (2021).

[12] Balkin J M. Free speech in the algorithmic society: big data, private governance, and new school speech regulation [J]. University of California, Davis Law Review, 2018, 51: 1149-1210.

[13] Ilin A. A new cyberbullying law? Extension of legal interpretations in China and Russia [J]. International Journal of Law, Ethics and Technology, 2022, 2: 56-86.

[14] Jing Lijia. The development of the system of network service providers' cyber violence governace obligations [J]. Northern Legal Science, 2023, 17(5): 37-50.

[15] Zhu Xiaoyan. Towards media justice: Platform role and law implementation of cyber violence information governance [J]. Journal of Central South University (Social Sciences), 2024, 30(1): 50-62.

[16] Beck U. Risk society: Towards a New Modernity [M]. Ritter M Trans. London: SAGE Publications, 1992.

[17] Jiang Ying. The direction and limits of criminal law regulation on the risks of artificial intelligence deepfake technology [J]. Nanjing Journal of Social Sciences, 2021, 9: 101-109.

[18] Supreme People's Procuratorate of the People's Republic of China. The 34th Batch of Guiding Cases of the Supreme People's Procuratorate [EB/OL]. (2022).Available at: https://www.spp.gov.cn/spp/jczdal/202202/t20220221_545125.shtml(accessed26 August 2025).

[19] The First Intermediate People's Court of Beijing Municipality. Criminal judgment: Case No. (2016) Beijing 01 Criminal Appeal No. 592.

[20] Zhang M K. Reflection on several theoretical issues of criminal law in the ‘risk society’ [J]. Studies in Law and Business, 2011, 28(5): 83-94.

[21] Sunstein C R. Free speech now [J]. The University of Chicago Law Review, 1992, 59: 255-316.

[22] Stevens J P. The freedom of speech [J]. The Yale Law Journal, 1993, 102: 1293-1313.

[23] Douek E. Governing online speech: From ‘post-as-trumps’ to proportionality and probability [J]. Columbia Law Review, 2021, 121(3): 759-833.

[24] Klonick K. The new governors: The people, rules and processes governing online speech [J]. Harvard Law Review, 2018, 131: 1598-1670.

[25] Dvoskin B. Expert Governance of Online Speech [J]. Harvard International Law Journal, 2023, 64(1): 85-135.

[26] Lessig L. Code: Version 2.0 [M]. New York: Basic Books, 2006.

[27] Van Dijk J, Poell T, De Waal M. The Platform Society: Public Values in a Connective World [M]. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018.

[28] Kim N S, Telman D A. Internet giants as quasi-governmental actors and the limits of contractual consent [J]. Missouri Law Review, 2015, 80: 723-770.

[29] Verbeek P P. What Things Do: Philosophical Reflections on Technology, Agency, and Design [M]. University Park, PA: Penn State Press, 2005.

[30] Tomberg P. How platforms govern: Social regulation in digital capitalism [J]. Big Data & Society, 2023, 10(1): 1-13.

[31] Venturini J, Bruno F, Dantas M T, et al. Terms of Service and Human Rights: An Analysis of Online Platform Contracts [M]. 2nd ed. Rio de Janeiro: Editora Revan, 2016.

[32] Langford M. Taming the digital leviathan: Automated decision-making and international human rights [J]. American Journal of International Law Unbound, 2020, 114: 141-146.