Research on the Philosophical Issues of Artificial Intelligence Legislation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62051/ijsspa.v6n3.07Keywords:
Artificial Intelligence, Value of Law, Hard Law Approach, Soft Law ApproachAbstract
The Natural Law School, the Positivist Law School, and the Sociological Law School hold different views on artificial intelligence (AI) legislation. The main divergence among these three schools lies in their understanding of soft law and hard law approaches. This paper takes the value of law as the entry point and analyzes relevant legal norms through legal interpretation theory to explore the implications of the three schools' views on AI legislation for current legislation.
Downloads
References
[1] Luo Haocai. Soft Law and Public Governance. Peking University Press, 2006, pp. 49–50.
[2] R.W.MDisa,Jurisprudence,Butterworths,1985,p.470.
[3] E. Levin: Human Rights: Questions and Answers. The Commercial Press (Hong Kong), 1990, pp. 58-59.
[4] H.Kelsen,General Theory of Law and State,Harvard University Press,1945,p.111.
[5] Zhang Wenxian: A Study of Western Legal Philosophy Trends in the Twentieth Century. Law Press, 1996 edition, pp. 108-109.
[6] Luo Haocai, et al.: Soft Law and Public Governance. Peking University Press, 2006, pp. 8-9.
[7] Zhang Yanqiang: "On the Impact of Amicus Curiae Opinions on the South China Sea Arbitration Case between China and the Philippines," Asia-Pacific Security and Maritime Research, Issue 3, 2018, pp. 44-45.
[8] Edited by Huang Zhixiong: Non-Governmental Organizations from the Perspective of International Law: Trends, Impacts, and Responses. China University of Political Science and Law Press, 2012, pp. 49-51.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 International Journal of Social Sciences and Public Administration
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
