Research on the Theory of Procedural Justice in Civil Litigation Inclusiveness
From the Perspective of Civil Litigation and Diversified Dispute Resolution Mechanisms
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62051/ijsspa.v7n1.07Keywords:
Inclusiveness, Diversity, JusticeAbstract
The theory of procedural justice, which was transplanted to China in the 1990s, has undergone theoretical development and has had a profound impact on China's civil litigation procedures and judicial practices. However, it has also encountered challenges such as procedural instrumentalism and judicial centrism. The overall value orientation of our society is developing towards diversification, which has also led to the diversification of civil disputes and people's demand for justice in China. The theory of procedural justice in civil litigation not only needs to break the closed nature of research fields, but also needs to break the closed nature of justice theories in other fields. The inclusiveness of civil litigation procedures also requires the concept of sharing and co governance to resolve disputes. This article systematically constructs a program based on the theory of dialogue mechanism, aiming to open up channels for all forces that can assist in resolving civil disputes to enter the civil litigation process and help resolve disputes; On the other hand, based on the theory of open procedural justice, the connection and inclusiveness between civil litigation procedures and other dispute resolution mechanisms have been constructed at the theoretical and institutional levels, thus forming an inclusive theory of procedural justice.
Downloads
References
[1] Allen Lind, Tom Taylor: "Social Psychology of Procedural Justice," translated by Feng Jianpeng, Law Press, 2017 edition, p. 64
[2] Jessica McLean, Digital justice in Australian visa application processes, Alternative Law Journal, Vol. 44, Issue 4, 2019
[3] Qiu Gengtian, Zhang Rongjie: "On Inclusive Development," Learning and Exploration, 2011, Issue 1.
[4] Yuan Dasong: "Towards the Construction of an Inclusive Rule of Law Country," China Law Journal, 2013, Issue 2
[5] Liu Yanhong: "Construction and Promotion of Inclusive Criminal Law Governance - Conflict and Solution of Basic Models of Criminal Law Governance", Modern Law, Issue 2, 2009.
[6] Shi Jichun and Zhao Zhonglong: "The Historical Dimension of China's Socialist Economic Rule of Law", Legal Journal, Issue 5, 2011.
[7] Zhang Jianming, Tan Bohua: "Plato's Critique of Empiricism epistemology," Journal of Xiangtan University, 2019, Issue 2.
[8] Huang Weiwei, Wang Wanyu: "Exploration of the existing problems and countermeasures of the people's mediation system - based on field investigations in X community, H city, northern Jiangsu province
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 International Journal of Social Sciences and Public Administration

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.