The Practice Instructor System: Salvation or Illusion in Master’s-Level Social Work Education?

Keke Qin

doi:10.62051/ijsspa.v6n3.16

Authors

Keke Qin

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62051/ijsspa.v6n3.16

Keywords:

Paradox of the Practice Instructor System, Challenges in Educational Reform, Shortcomings in Practice-based Teaching, The Myth of Application-oriented Training

Abstract

Although master's programs in social work claim to prioritize the cultivation of practice-oriented professionals, in reality, they have long been trapped in a dilemma of "emphasizing theory while neglecting practice." As a result, graduates often find themselves ill-equipped to address complex social issues. The practice instructor system has been heralded as a potential panacea for bridging this gap. However, its implementation has repeatedly faltered due to a lack of qualified mentors, institutional deficiencies, and structural limitations. Adopting a critical perspective, this paper questions the effectiveness of the current model of social work education at the master’s level and directly confronts the multiple constraints facing the practice instructor system. Despite the numerous challenges, the paper argues that the practice instructor system is not an unattainable ideal. With targeted institutional design and well-calibrated incentive mechanisms, it holds significant potential to become a catalyst for substantive reform in social work education.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Xiang Rong. “Innovation, Integration, and Collaboration: Exploring Pathways to Break Through the Current Dilemmas in Social Work Education”, Journal of China Agricultural University: Social Sciences Edition, Vol. 34, No. 3, pp. 79-89, 2017. https://doi.org/10.13240/j.cnki.caujsse.20170614.005.

[2] Maynard S., Mertz L., Fortune A. “Off-Site Supervision in Social Work Education: What Makes It Work?”, Journal of Social Work Education, Vol. 51, pp. 519-534, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1080/10437797.2015.1043201.

[3] howers N., Cuzzi L. “What field instructors of social work students need from hospital field work programs”, Social Work in Health Care, Vol. 16, No. 1, pp. 39-52, 1992. https://doi.org/10.1300/J010V16N01_04.

[4] Castillo J., Hendrix E., Nguyen V., Riquino M. “Macro Practice Supervision by Social Work Field Instructors”, Journal of Social Work Education, Vol. 58, pp. 333-345, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1080/10437797.2021.1885539.

[5] Beimers D. “Legislative Advocacy Days: Building Political Self-Efficacy in Social Work Students”, Journal of Policy Practice, Vol. 15, pp. 269-288, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1080/15588742.2015.1081577.

[6] Kam P. “Back to the ‘social’ of social work: Reviving the social work profession’s contribution to the promotion of social justice”, International Social Work, Vol. 57, pp. 723-740, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020872812447118.

[7] Tufford L., Gauthier L., Ologan E., Bogo M., Katz E., McKee E. “What motivates social workers to become field instructors: Perspectives from Canada”, Transformative Social Work, 2024. https://doi.org/10.55016/ojs/tsw.v2i1.78214.

[8] Mehrotra G., Tecle A., Ha A., Ghneim S., Gringeri C. “Challenges to Bridging Field and Classroom Instruction: Exploring Field Instructors’ Perspectives on Macro Practice”, Journal of Social Work Education, Vol. 54, pp. 135-147, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1080/10437797.2017.1404522.

[9] Mcbeath B. “Re-Envisioning Macro Social Work Practice”, Families in Society: The Journal of Contemporary Social Services, Vol. 97, pp. 14-15, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1606/1044-3894.2016.97.9.

[10] George P., Siver S., Preston S. “Reimagining Field Education in Social Work: The Promise Unveiled”, Advances in Social Work, Vol. 14, pp. 642-657, 2013. https://doi.org/10.18060/2440.