Analysis of the Differences in Host-guest Interaction Willingness and Behavior from the Perspective of the New Generation of Tourists

Authors

  • Mengran Luo

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62051/ijsspa.v8n1.08

Keywords:

New Generation Tourists, Host-guest Interaction, Intention and Behavior, Grounded Theory

Abstract

With the generational change of tourism subjects, the new generation of tourists (born after 1990) has gradually become the main force in the tourism market. Their stronger desire for expression, pursuit of individuality and high dependence on digital media have led to their unique behavioral characteristics in the interaction between host and guest. Although this group generally expects to achieve deep communication with local residents, their actual behavior mostly stays at a shallow level of interaction, showing a misalignment phenomenon of "expecting depth but stopping at the surface". Based on the grounded theory, this paper selected 30 new generation tourists for in-depth interviews, identified five core categories of interaction willingness, actual behavior, behavior restriction factors, alternative paths and self-regulation, and constructed a theoretical model of "willingness-behavior misalignment" in the interaction between host and guest of the new generation of tourists. The study found that social anxiety, communication barriers and unfamiliar environment are the key factors that restrict deep interaction. After perception is restricted, tourists tend to rely on digital media for information acquisition and indirect communication, and alleviate the psychological gap through a variety of self-regulation strategies. This study systematically reveals the psychological and behavioral paths of the obstructed transformation of interaction willingness, and provides a new perspective and practical reference for understanding the social behavior characteristics of the new generation of tourists and optimizing tourism experience.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Cohen, Wu Ning, Ma Congling, et al. “A longitudinal study of tourism sociology[M]. Nankai University Press, 2007.

[2] Chen Li, Yuan Xiaolu. Research on the impact of rural tourism host-guest interaction on tourists' behavioral intentions: a chain mediation model based on dual emotional variables [J]. Frontier Economy and Culture, 2025, (04): 65-70.

[3] Rawls A W. Interaction order or interaction ritual: Comment on Collins[J]. Symbolic Interaction, 1989, 12(1): 103-109.

[4] Fan DXF, Jia G. How do tourists respond to meta-stereotypes? Understanding their willingness to interact, self-presentation and the role of power[J]. Tourism Management, 2023, 94: 104652.

[5] Kannisto P. Traveling like locals: Market resistance in long-term travel[J]. Tourism management, 2018, 67: 297-306.

[6] Du Jiang, Xiang Ping. On the sustainable development of rural tourism[J]. Tourism Tribune, 1999, (1): 15-18+73.

[7] Wang Jianqin. The impact of rural tourism host-guest interaction on tourists' citizen behavior under the perspective of high-quality development[J]. Regional Research and Development, 2021, 40(04): 85-90.

[8] Zhou Chunfa. Analysis of host-guest relationship in tourism field: Taking Huicun as an example[J]. Journal of Lanzhou University of Commerce, 2013, 29(4): 122-126.

[9] Zhai Honghua. Study on purchasing characteristics and behavior of new generation consumers[J]. Marketing Weekly (Theoretical Research), 2011, (11): 48-49.

[10] Yang Guoqiang. Research on the characteristics of the new generation and tourism product development strategies[J]. Journal of Harbin University, 2020, 41(11): 46-48.

[11] Leon Festinger. Cognitive Dissonance Theory[M]. Zhejiang Education Press, 1999, 4-7

[12] Bhattacherjee A, Sanford C. The intention– behavior gap in technology usage: the moderating role of attitude strength[J]. Behavior & information technology, 2009, 28(4): 389-401.

[13] Reuter T, Ziegelmann JP, Wiedemann AU, et al. Planning bridges the intention– behavior gap: Age makes a difference and strategy use explains why[J]. Psychology and Health, 2010, 25(7): 873-887.

[14] Shirokova G, Osiyevskyy O, Bogatyreva K. Exploring the intention–behavior link in student entrepreneurship: Moderating effects of individual and environmental characteristics[J]. European Management Journal, 2016, 34(4): 386-399.

[15] Rubin. Qualitative interview method: the art of listening and asking questions[M]. Chongqing University Press, 2010.

[16] Shi Chunyan, Dong Hao. Research on the influencing factors and formation mechanism of food tourism experience: an exploration based on grounded theory[J]. Journal of Hunan First Normal University, 2025, 25(02): 101-108.

[17] Yang Peng, Yu Dian-song, Shi Yong, et al. Perceptual evaluation of tourism experience quality of marathon participants and its formation mechanism: an exploratory study based on grounded theory [J/OL]. Tourism Science, 1-17 [2025-07-10].

[18] Jia Huimin, Zhang Yunlai. Research on the generation mechanism of tourists' happiness in virtual tourism product experience: based on the perspective of embodied experience[J]. Tourism Science, 2022, 36(03): 17-35.

[19] Eusébio CA, Carneiro MJ A. Determinants of tourist–host interactions: An analysis of the university student market[J]. Journal of Quality Assurance in Hospitality & Tourism, 2012, 13(2): 123-151.

Downloads

Published

2025-08-13

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Luo, M. (2025). Analysis of the Differences in Host-guest Interaction Willingness and Behavior from the Perspective of the New Generation of Tourists. International Journal of Social Sciences and Public Administration, 8(1), 61-69. https://doi.org/10.62051/ijsspa.v8n1.08