Research on the Unjust Enrichment Remedies for Personal Information Leakage in China
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62051/ijsspa.v8n1.16Keywords:
Data Elements, Personal Information Leakage, Tort Law, Unjustified EnrichmentAbstract
As an important strategic resource, personal information data not only possesses personality interests, but also contains great economic potential. However, the problem of personal information leakage has become increasingly serious. Whether it is the traditional tort remedy or the“risk-based damage theory”, such problems are faced with practical or theoretical dilemmas, such as the difficulty of determining “damage” and the excessive burden of proof. Based on this, this article advocates the improper enrichment law as the core, to build a new type of personal information leakage relief path. First of all, unjustified enrichment relief path has the value of legitimacy and practical operability, through the personal information leakage is divided into “active leakage” and “passive leakage” of two kinds of situations, will be recognized as the rights and interests of infringement of unjustified enrichment, and based on the Chinese law, the law of unjustified enrichment is the most effective way to protect the rights and interests of the people of China. By classifying personal information leakage into “active leakage” and “passive leakage”, identifying it as unjustified enrichment, and based on Chinese law, interpreting the constituent elements and legal effects of unjustified enrichment on the basis of infringement of rights and interests, it not only can give full play to the complementary function of unjustified enrichment, but also can realize the relief of the subject of information.
Downloads
References
[1] "Research on Ten Major Trends in Digital Economy Development During the '15th Five-Year Plan' Period", National Industrial Information Security Development Research Center Website, https://www.cics-cert.org.cn/web_root/webpage/articlecontent_101006_1807653257296744449.html, last accessed: February 19, 2025.
[2] Zhang, Xinbao, "On Data Property Right as a New Type of Property Right", in China Social Science, No. 4, p. 150, 2023.
[3] Survey Report on App Personal Information Leakage, in Xinhua News Agency Client, https://baijiahao.baidu.com/s?id=1617634176408235352&wfr=spider&for=pc, last accessed: January 20, 2025.
[4] Report on Data Leakage Risk Posture in the First Half of 2024, in PENGPAI website, https://www.thepaper.cn/newsDetail_forward_27963751, last accessed: January 20, 2025
[5] See Jiang, Weiwei, "Exploration of Tort Liability for Personal Information - Centering on the Basis of Claims," in Journal of Southeast University (Philosophy and Social Science Edition) , No. S2, pp. 1-4,2024.SeeXie, Hongfei, "Damage" in the Composition of Tort Liability for Leakage of Personal Information: On the Conceptualization of Damage in a Risk Society," in Journal of the National Prosecutor's College, Issue 5, p. 31, 2021.
[6] See Zhao, Beibei, "The Dilemma of "Damages" in the Private Law Relief of Personal Information and the Path of Response", in Finance and Economics Law, No. 5, p. 101, 2022.
[7] Yang, Yinhong and Zhang, Tong, "The Path of Determining the Risky Damage of Personal Information Infringement", in Journal of Fuzhou University (Philosophy and Social Science Edition), No. 6, pp. 110-111, 2022.
[8] Li, Aijun: "Construction of Legal System for Cultivation of Data Factor Market", in Journal of Law, No. 9, pp. 22-23, 2021.
[9] Li, Aijun: "Legal System Construction of Data Source Supply Subjects in Data Factor Market", in Journal of Chinese Academy of Social Sciences University, No. 12, p. 67, 2022.
[10] Wang, Zejian, Torts, Peking University Press, pp. 175-176, 2016 edition.
[11] See Cheng, Hailing, "Evidence and Determination of Risky Damage of Personal Information Tort", in Journal of Chongqing University (Social Science Edition) , No. 5, p. 4, 2023.
[12] Friedrich Mommsen, Beitraege zum Obligationenrecht, 2. Abteilung, Zur Lehre von dem Interesse, 1855, §2, S.14l; §14, S.133.
[13] Xie, Zhengshan, "Research on the Damage Problem of Data Leakage," in Tsinghua Law, No. 4, 2020.
[14] Lin, Huanmin, "The Dual Legal Construction of Personal Data Transactions," in Legal Studies, Vol. 5, No. 5, p. 37, 2022.
[15] Shen, Weixing, "On the Right to Use Data for Benefit", in China Social Science, No. 11, p. 123, 2020.
[16] Beijing Internet Court (2019) Jing 0491 Civil First No. 6694 Civil Judgment.
[17] Beijing Chaoyang District People's Court (2018) Jing 0105 Civil First No. 9840 Civil Judgment.
[18] See Cheng, Xiao, "On the Rules of Handling Personal Information in China's Personal Information Protection Law," in Tsinghua Law, No. 3, p. 62, 2021.
[19] Civil Judgment of Nanjing Intermediate People's Court of Jiangsu Province (2014) Ning Civil Final No. 5028 Civil Judgment.
[20] Cameron F. Kerry and John B. Morris, "Why Data Ownership Is the Wrong Approach to Protecting Privacy", Brookings, 2019.
[21] See Wu, Handong, "Institutional Arrangements and Legal Regulation in the Age of Artificial Intelligence", in Legal Science (Journal of Northwestern University of Politics and Law), No. 5, p. 129, 2017.
[22] See Su, Yu, "The Structured Interpretation of the Risk Prevention Principle," in Legal Studies, No. 1, 2021.
[23] Zhang, Tao, "Exploring the Dimension of the Risk Control Path of Personal Information Protection", in Jiao Tong University Law, No. 6, p. 70, 2022.
[24] See Wang, Zejian, "The Construction of the Interpretation of Unjust Enrichment Law", in Jiao Tong University Law, No. 4, p. 6, 2024.
[25] See Zuo, Chuanwei, "Reflection on Unjust Enrichment of Rights and Interests Infringement", in Jurisprudence, No. 3, p. 94, 2010.
[26] Wang, Hongliang, "The System and Application of the Basis of the Right to Claim the Return of Profits in the Civil Code", in Jurist, No. 3, p. 30, 2021.
[27] See Wang, Zejian, Unjust Enrichment (Second Edition), Peking University Press, pp. 2-3, 2015 Edition.
[28] See Hong, Xuejun, "On Unjust Enrichment by Infringing on the Rights and Interests of Others--An Analysis of the Competing Claims for Tort Damages and the Claims for the Return of Unjust Enrichment", in Journal of the China Institute of Youth Politics, No. 2, p. 118, 2003.
[29] See Cty. of San Bernardino v. Walsh, 158 Cal.App.4th 533, 542, 69 Cal.Rptr.3d 848 (2007).
[30] See Strahilevitz Lior Jacob, "Data Security's Unjust Enrichment Theory," The University of Chicago Law Review, 2020, pp 2477-2492.
[31] Xie, Diyan, "Tort or Unjust Enrichment: A Discussion on the Path of Civil Remedies for Personal Information Leakage", in Journal of Beijing Institute of Technology (Social Science Edition), No. 2, p. 139, 2024.
[32] See Yang, Xu: "On the System Construction of Claims Norms in the Civil Code", in China Law Review, No. 3, p. 211, 2022.
[33] Huang, Wei, edited by Huang Wei, Interpretation and Application Guide of the Civil Code of the People's Republic of China (in Chinese), China Democratic Law System Press, p. 1451, 2020 edition.
[34] See Wang, Zejian, Unjust Enrichment (Second Edition), Peking University Press, p. 142, 2015 Edition.
[35] Hans-Josef Willing, German Unjust Enrichment Law (Fourth Edition), China Law Press 2021, pp. 6-12.
[36] Xie, Diyan: "Tort or Unjust Enrichment: The Civil Remedy Path of Personal Information Leakage", in Journal of Beijing Institute of Technology (Social Science Edition), No. 2, pp. 140-141, 2024.
[37] Hans-Josef Willing: German Unjust Enrichment Law (Fourth Edition), China Law Press 2021, p. 47.
[38] Huang, Wei, edited by Huang Wei, Interpretation and Application Guidelines of the Civil Code of the People's Republic of China (Middle Volume), China Democracy and Legal System Press, p. 1454, 2020 Edition.
[39] Hans-Josef Willing, German Unjust Enrichment Law (Fourth Edition), China Law Press 2021 Edition, p. 53. Huang Wei, edited by Huang Wei, Interpretation and Application Guide of the Civil Code of the People's Republic of China (Middle Book), China Democracy and Legal System Press, p. 1454, 2020 Edition.
[40] See Ye, Mingyi, "The Hilbert Problem of the Law of Unjustifiable Profit", in Zhongwai Jurisprudence, No. 4, p. 951, 2022.
[41] Hong, Xuejun: "On Unjust Enrichment by Infringing on the Rights and Interests of Others--An Analysis of the Competing Claims for Tort Damages and the Claims for Return of Unjust Enrichment", in Journal of China Youth Politics Institute, No. 2, p. 115, 2003.
[42] James Edelman and Elise Bant, "Unjust Enrichment", 2nd ed. Oxford: Hart Publishing, p. 332-333, 2016.
[43] See Huang, Wei, ed. Interpretation and Application Guide of the Civil Code of the People's Republic of China (Middle Book), China Democracy and Legal System Press, 2020 edition, p. 1460.
[44] See Cui, Jianyuan, "The Refinement of the Unjustifiable Profit Rule and Its Interpretation", in Modern Law, No. 3, p. 191, 2020.
[45] Ye, Mingyi, "The Hilbert Problem of the Law of Unjust Enrichment", in Zhongwai Jurisprudence, No. 4,p. 962, 2022.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 International Journal of Social Sciences and Public Administration

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.






