The Role of Trusts in Facilitating Cross-Border Transactions: Legal Functions, Regulatory Fragmentation, and Pathways to Coordination
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62051/ijsspa.v8n2.16Keywords:
Cross-Border Transactions, Trusts, Beneficial Owners, SecuritizationAbstract
This paper primarily explores the role of trusts in cross-border transactions and the challenges they face. As global economic exchanges deepen, trusts-due to their unique ability to segregate assets, mitigate bankruptcy risks, and enhance the efficiency and security of cross-border transactions-play a significant role not only in private wealth management but also in financing, investment, and digital assets. However, differences in national legal systems create numerous conflicts in trust application. For instance, the concept of "dual ownership" under common law systems often faces non-recognition in non-common law jurisdictions. Simultaneously, stricter scrutiny regarding beneficial owner disclosure and anti-money laundering compliance increases operational costs for trusts. Furthermore, the tension between transparency requirements and privacy protection within trust structures further complicates cross-border compliance. The article concludes by proposing solutions to these challenges, such as promoting the Hague Trust Convention, implementing the latest FATF standards, establishing mutual recognition mechanisms among major jurisdictions, and leveraging new technologies to improve disclosure practices. Overall, as trusts assume greater importance in cross-border finance, bridging institutional gaps across legal systems and reducing compliance burdens are critical to unlocking their full potential.
Downloads
References
[1] Hague Convention on the Law Applicable to Trusts and on their Recognition, opened for signature 1 July 1985, 1664 UNTS 311 (entered into force 1 January 1992).
[2] Trusts Act (Cayman Islands, 2021 Revision) pt VIII.
[3] Virgin Islands Special Trusts Act 2003 (BVI, rev 2020) s 3.
[4] Trustee Ordinance (Hong Kong, Cap 29, amended 2013) s 13A.
[5] Anti-Money Laundering and Counter-Terrorist Financing Ordinance (Hong Kong) Cap 615 (2011).
[6] Companies Ordinance (Hong Kong) Cap 622 (2012).
[7] Trust Companies Act 2005 (Singapore) s 4.
[8] Monetary Authority of Singapore, Notice on Prevention of Money Laundering and Countering the Financing of Terrorism – Trust Companies (MAS Notice TCA-N01, 2024).
[9] Corporate Transparency Act, 31 CFR § 1010.380 (US, effective 1 January 2024).
[10] Regulation (EU) 2024/1624 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 May 2024 on the Prevention of the Use of the Financial System for the Purposes of Money Laundering or Terrorist Financing [2024] OJ L 1624/1 (‘AMLR’).
[11] Directive (EU) 2024/1640 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 May 2024 on Mechanisms to Prevent the Use of the Financial System for the Purposes of Money Laundering or Terrorist Financing [2024] OJ L 1640/5 (‘AMLD’).
[12] OECD, Common Reporting Standard: Consolidated Text (OECD, 2025).
[13] Carreras Rothmans Ltd v Freeman Mathews Treasure Ltd [1985] Ch 207, 224–225 (Slade LJ).
[14] Barclays Bank Ltd v Quistclose Investments Ltd [1970] AC 567, 580 (Lord Wilberforce).
[15] WM v Luxembourg Business Registers (Joined Cases C-37/20 and C-601/20) [2022] ECLI:EU:C:2022:912, [74]–[82].
[16] Financial Action Task Force, Guidance on Beneficial Ownership and Transparency of Legal Arrangements (March 2024).
[17] Matthias Lehmann, ‘Trusts in Civil Law Jurisdictions’ (2023) 71(2) American Journal of Comparative Law 211.
[18] Reinhard Zimmermann, ‘The Law of Obligations and the Structure of Trusts’ (2022) 70(1) American Journal of Comparative Law 55, 70–72.
[19] David Pollard, ‘Quistclose Trusts Reconsidered’ (2024) 30(1) Trusts & Trustees 45, 50–52.
[20] K Schmidt, ‘Beneficial Ownership Transparency and the Limits of Public Access after WM v Luxembourg Business Registers’ (2024) 30(2) Trusts & Trustees 120.
[21] Swiss Federal Council, Press Release: Federal Council Decides Not to Introduce a Swiss Trust (15 March 2023).
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 International Journal of Social Sciences and Public Administration

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.






