Study on Logistics Development in RCEP Countries from the Perspective of LPI
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62051/ijsspa.v6n2.16Keywords:
LPI Index, RCEP; Regional Logistics Development, Coefficient of Variation, Cluster Analysis, Correspondence AnalysisAbstract
Using the Logistics Performance Index (LPI) as an entry point, this study provides a comprehensive analysis of the logistics development of each member country of the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership Agreement (RCEP) from 2010 to 2022. Firstly, the total LPI score of each country and the indicators of each dimension are carefully analysed using descriptive statistics, and it is found that there are obvious differences in the level of logistics development among member countries. China is already a logistics powerhouse, but there is still much room for improvement in customs clearance efficiency and service quality. Secondly, with the help of systematic clustering and correspondence analysis techniques, the member countries are divided into three groups of high, medium and low levels of logistics, which clearly presents the hierarchical structure of logistics performance of each country. The study shows that countries with advanced logistics such as Singapore and Japan have obvious advantages in terms of infrastructure development and customs operation efficiency; in contrast, countries with relatively low logistics development such as Cambodia and Laos have room for improvement in a number of key areas. In addition, the analysis of the coefficient of variation shows that although the unevenness of logistics performance across countries has been reduced, the improvement is limited, and the differences in the efficiency of infrastructure and customs are particularly striking, which may pose an obstacle to regional logistics integration. In this regard, this paper proposes the following recommendations: to promote the synergistic development of logistics and economic integration within the RCEP region by facilitating the development of logistics in the low-level RCEP member countries, strengthening the construction of key factors, continuously improving China's logistics performance, and deepening the regional logistics co-operation.
Downloads
References
[1] LSMAIL N W,MAHYIDEEN J M. The impact of infrastructure on trade and economic growth in selected economies in Asia[R].ADBI working paper,2015:553.
[2] Uca N., Ince H., Sumen H. The mediator effect of logistics performance index on the relation between corruption perception index and foreign trade volume[J]. European scientific journal, 2016(25) : 37-45.
[3] Acar A., Bentyn Z., Kocaoglu B. Logistics performance development of the countries on the path along the new silk road[J]. European Transport trasporti Europei, 2015(59): 1.
[4] Cemberci M., Civelek M., Canbolat N. The Moderator Effect of Global Competitiveness Index on Dimensions of Logistics Performance Index[J]. Procedia -Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2015, 195: 1514-1524.
[5] Burmaoglu S., Sesen H. Analyzing the dependency between national logistics performance and competitiveness: which logistics competence is core for national strategy? [J].Journal of competitiveness, 2011, 3(4) : 1301-1305.
[6] Garcia L., Marti L., Martin J., et al. A DEA- logistic performance index [C].// European transport conference, Campus Westend, Frankfurt, Germany.Sep, 2015.
[7] Su S., Ke J. National logistics performance benchmarking for trade connectivity - an innovative approach using world bank logistics performance index database[C].// International conference on “global integration of economies and connectivity development” in collaboration with asianlogistics round table(ALRT) , At Taipei, Taiwan. 2015.
[8] Bakar M., Jaafar H. Malaysian Logistics Performance: A Manufacturer's Perspective [J]. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2016, 224: 571-578.
[9] Marti L., Puertas R., Garcia L. The importance of the logistics performance index in international trade[J]. Applied economics, 2014(24) : 2982-2992.
[10] Bilovodska O., Gryshchenko O., Syhyda L. Specific features of regional logistics potential consideration in the process of the enterprise distribution system development[J]. Economic Annals-XXI, 2016. 85(9):994-1001.
[11] Rodrigue, Jean-Paul, and Theo Notteboom. "Comparative North American and European gateway logistics: the regionalism of freight distribution." Journal of Transport Geography 18.4 (2010): 497-507.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 International Journal of Social Sciences and Public Administration

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.