Research on the Sustainable Development Path from the Dual Perspectives of Policy Regulation and Behavioral Intervention
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62051/ijsspa.v9n1.31Keywords:
Policy Regulation, Behavioral Intervention, Sustainable Development, Collaborative Pathways, Environmental GovernanceAbstract
Global sustainable development is facing multiple challenges such as climate change, resource scarcity, and ecological degradation. Traditional governance models that rely solely on policy regulation or individual behavioral intervention are no longer effective in addressing such complex systemic problems. This article takes the collaborative mechanism of "policy rigidity constraint behavior flexibility guidance" as the analysis core, and comprehensively uses literature review, cross theoretical integration, and typical case analysis methods to systematically explore the practical path of sustainable development from a dual perspective. Research has shown that policy regulation needs to rely on legislative improvement, standard setting, and a combination of incentive and constraint tools to construct a sustainable development institutional framework, providing direction guidance and institutional guarantees for behavioral intervention; Behavioral intervention requires cognitive guidance, habit cultivation, and social mobilization to stimulate the participation of individuals, businesses, and social organizations, filling the "last mile" gap in policy implementation. The synergy between the two needs to focus on three dimensions: goal synergy, tool complementarity, and information exchange: policy formulation needs to fully align with the cognitive laws and interests of the actors, avoiding a disconnect between institutional design and practice; Behavioral intervention should be guided by policies to prevent a tendency towards decentralization and fragmentation. By analyzing typical cases such as the EU carbon trading system, China's "Ten Million Project", and Japan's community waste classification intervention, this article extracts a path model of "policy framework behavior details collaborative efficiency improvement", providing theoretical support and practical reference for global sustainable development practice.
Downloads
References
[1] Kurian M. The water-energy-food nexus: trade-offs, thresholds and transdisciplinary approaches to sustainable development[J]. Environmental Science & Policy, 2017, 68: 97-106.
[2] Schultz P W. Changing behavior with normative feedback interventions: A field experiment on curbside recycling[J]. Basic and applied social psychology, 1999, 21(1): 25-36.
[3] Ostrom E. Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action[M]. Cambridge university press, 1990.
[4] Xu Guangjian, Lu Qianqian, Xu Kun Cracking the dilemma of policy implementation: based on the multi task delegation agency model [J]. Administrative Management Reform, 2020, (09):48-59.DOI:10.14150/j.cnki.1674-7453.2020.09.004.
[5] DiMaggio P J, Powell W W. The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields[J]. American sociological review, 1983, 48(2): 147-160.
[6] Arnstein S R. A ladder of citizen participation[J]. Journal of the American Institute of planners, 1969, 35(4): 216-224.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 International Journal of Social Sciences and Public Administration

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.






