The Relationship between Job Stress and Employees' Innovation Behavior

Authors

  • Qingqing Wu

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62051/ijsspa.v9n2.07

Keywords:

Job Characteristics, Job Demands, Job Resources, Challenging Stress, Innovative Behavior

Abstract

With the fierce market competition, employees' innovative behavior is crucial for organizations to maintain competitiveness. Targeting Chinese corporate employees, this study aims to reveal how job characteristics (including demands and resources) influence employee innovation behavior through challenging and hindering job stress. The empirical research is based on questionnaire survey data. 517 enterprise employees in China were investigated with the Job Requirements-Resources Scale, Challenge-Hindrance Stress Scale, and Innovation Behavior Scale. Results show that: (1) Job demands, challenging stress, and job resources differ significantly by gender (males > females); analysis found that job requirements show a specific trend with age: employees aged 29-39 have the highest job requirements, followed by employees aged 18-28, and both are significantly higher than those aged 40-50 and above; innovative behavior is higher in private enterprises than in state-owned enterprises. (2) Correlation analysis results indicate significant positive correlations among the variables studied. Specifically:Job demands are not only positively correlated with job resources, but also with challenging stress and innovative behavior; Job resources are significantly positively correlated with challenging stress and innovative behavior;Furthermore, challenging stress has also been shown to be significantly positively correlated with innovative behavior.(3) The study shows that challenging stress mediates the impact of job demands on innovative behavior, and job resources moderate the relationship between job demands and challenging stress. This conclusion has guiding value for Chinese organizations to improve employee innovation through job design optimization.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Guo, C.C., & Zhang, X.M. (2007). Significance and risk analysis of enterprise innovation. Private Science and Technology, (9), 203.

[2] Huang, N.Y., & Wang, P.D. (2013). Thoughts on institutional design for implementing innovation-driven development strategy. China Soft Science, (4).

[3] Cavanaugh, M.A., Boswell, W.R., Roehling, M.V., & Boudreau, J.W. (2000). An empirical examination of self-reported work stress among U.S. managers. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(1), 65-74.

[4] Haar, J.M. (2006). Challenge and hindrance stressors in New Zealand: exploring social exchange theory outcomes. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 17(11), 1942-1950.

[5] Karasek,R.A.(1979).Job demands, job decision latitude,and mentalstrain:implications for job redesign, Administrative Science Quarterly,24(2), 285-308.

[6] Demerouti, E., Bakker, A.B., Nachreiner, F., & Schaufeli, W.B. (2001). The job demands-resources model of burnout. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(3), 499-512.

[7] Wang, Y.M., et al. (2016). Research on implementation strategies of innovation-driven development strategy. China Soft Science, (4), 112.

[8] Bunce, D., & West, M. (1994). Changing work environments: innovative coping responses to occupational stress. Work & Stress, 8(4), 319-331.

Downloads

Published

2025-12-10

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Wu, Q. (2025). The Relationship between Job Stress and Employees’ Innovation Behavior. International Journal of Social Sciences and Public Administration, 9(2), 54-59. https://doi.org/10.62051/ijsspa.v9n2.07