Urban Renewal Practice Empowered by Smart Technology: With Sustainable Inheritance of Cultural Heritage as the Core

Zhongyi Jing

doi:10.62051/ijsspa.v10n3.01

Authors

Zhongyi Jing

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62051/ijsspa.v10n3.01

Keywords:

Cultural Heritage, Urban Renewal, Smart Technology, Sustainable Inheritance, Sustainable Utilization

Abstract

Urban renewal is an important lever for promoting high-quality urban development, and the sustainable inheritance of cultural heritage is the core direction that urban renewal cannot deviate from. With the accelerated implementation of smart technology in urban governance, digital and intelligent means provide a new path to solve the pain points of cultural heritage protection in urban renewal. This article closely follows the cultural relic work policy of "protection first, rescue first; rational utilization, strengthen management", and analyzes the practical application of smart technology in cultural heritage resource survey, living inheritance, spatial restoration, revitalization and utilization, and public participation, based on publicly reported renovation practices such as Qingdao Dabao Island block and Beijing central axis. Research has found that smart technology can effectively balance the relationship between cultural heritage protection and urban functional upgrading, achieve the symbiosis of historical context continuation and modern urban development, and provide specific ideas for urban renewal practices in various regions.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Angelidou M, Stylianidis E. Cultural heritage in smart city environments: The update[J]. ISPRS Annals of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, 2020, 2: 957-964.

[2] Mecocci A, Abrardo A. Monitoring architectural heritage by wireless sensors networks: San Gimignano-A case study[J]. Sensors, 2014, 14(1): 770-778.

[3] Tan J, Leng J, Zeng X, et al. Digital twin for Xiegong’s architectural archaeological research: A case study of Xuanluo Hall, Sichuan, China[J]. Buildings, 2022, 12(7): 1053.

[4] Haddad N A. From ground surveying to 3D laser scanner: A review of techniques used for spatial documentation of historic sites[J]. Journal of King Saud University-Engineering Sciences, 2011, 23(2): 109-118.

[5] Hou Y, Kenderdine S, Picca D, et al. Digitizing intangible cultural heritage embodied: State of the art[J]. Journal on Computing and Cultural Heritage (JOCCH), 2022, 15(3): 1-20.

[6] Lak A, Gheitasi M, Timothy D J. Urban regeneration through heritage tourism: Cultural policies and strategic management[J]. Journal of Tourism and Cultural Change, 2020, 18(4): 386-403.

[7] Luther W, Baloian N, Biella D, et al. Digital twins and enabling technologies in museums and cultural heritage: An overview[J]. Sensors, 2023, 23(3): 1583.

[8] Jouan P, Hallot P. Digital twin: Research framework to support preventive conservation policies[J]. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 2020, 9(4): 228.

[9] Li J, Krishnamurthy S, Roders A P, et al. Community participation in cultural heritage management: A systematic literature review comparing Chinese and international practices[J]. Cities, 2020, 96: 102476.

[10] Shin H B. Urban conservation and revalorisation of dilapidated historic quarters: The case of Nanluoguxiang in Beijing[J]. Cities, 2010, 27: S43-S54.