Research on the Controversy and Optimization Path of Rent Pricing Mechanism for Public Rental Housing: A Policy Analysis based on the Background of Concentrated Market Entry in Multiple Regions in 2025
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62051/ijsspa.v10n4.08Keywords:
Public Rental Housing, Rent Pricing Mechanism, Social Justice, Welfare, Pluralism, Ecosystem TheoryAbstract
With the continuous advancement of urbanization in China, the housing pressure on new urban residents and young people has become prominent. The supply of public rental housing has entered a concentrated phase, and the rental pricing mechanism has sparked debates on fairness and sustainability. This paper focuses on the core issue: how to ensure the affordability of tenants while achieving sustainable operation of the project and addressing the conflicts of interests among multiple stakeholders. By using the methods of literature analysis and policy text comparison, and combining social justice, welfare pluralism and ecosystem theory to construct a three-dimensional analytical framework, this paper analyzes the structural contradictions in the current pricing mechanism. The research finds that rental governance needs to go beyond the administrative price limit thinking, establish a dynamic model of "benchmark rent + floating coefficient", promote the collaborative governance of the government, market, society and tenants, and introduce social workers to participate in demand assessment, rights advocacy and community mediation to enhance the inclusiveness and resilience of the system. The limitation lies in the lack of support from field interview data. In the future, qualitative research can be deepened by combining the practice of front-line social workers.
Downloads
References
[1] Huang, L. (2025). Exploration of Financing Paths for REITs-based Affordable Rental Housing under the Background of Urbanization. Financial Guest, (7), 64-66.
[2] Zheng, X. (2024). Rawls’ Difference Principle Research. Journal of Central China Normal University, 6.
[3] Cao, D., & Liang, A. (2024). Research on the Multi-Subject Roles in Public Welfare Trusteeship Projects from the Perspective of Welfare Pluralism: Based on a Government-Purchased Service Project. Journal of Hebei Youth Management Cadre College, 36(1), 60-67.
[4] Qiao, D., & Ciren, J. (2020). Research on Strategies for Enhancing Vocational Competence of Students in Higher Vocational Colleges in Xizang Based on the Brown-Fen-Brenner Ecosystem Theory. China Management Informatization, 28(7), 220-223.
[5] Yu, L., Mo, L., Liu, Q. (2021). Analysis of the Current Psychological Crisis Situation and Influencing Factors of 217 Adolescent Children with Cancer from the Perspective of Ecosystem Theory. Journal of Chongqing Medical University, 46(4), 474-480.
[6] Liu, J., & Meng, H. (2009). About Bronfenbrenner’s Developmental Psychology Ecosystem Theory. Chinese Journal of Health Psychology, (2), 250-252.
[7] Han, A., & Gao, H. (2024). Analysis of the Evolution and Effectiveness of China's Affordable Housing Policy and References to Singapore's HDB Mechanism: Reform Suggestions from the Perspective of Policy Tools. Shanghai Real Estate, (12), 10-14.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 International Journal of Social Sciences and Public Administration

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.






