Social Organizations’ Embedding in Grid-Based Governance: A Resource Dependence Perspective on Pathways and Mechanisms
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62051/ijsspa.v10n8.01Keywords:
Social Organizations, Grid-Based Governance, Grassroots Governance, Resource Dependence TheoryAbstract
With the increasing complexity of grassroots governance and diversified social demands, traditional grid-based governance faces challenges such as insufficient governance resources and limited capacity for social participation. As an important actor connecting the state and society, social organizations have become increasingly involved in grassroots governance. Based on resource dependence theory, this study explores the pathways and mechanisms of social organizations’ embedding in grid-based governance. It argues that such embedding is a dynamic process driven by the interaction between governance demands and resource exchange. Specifically, social organizations achieve embedding through three interconnected processes: resource acquisition, relationship building, and functional embedding. Through providing human, professional, and social resources, social organizations complement the limitations of administrative governance, establish stable connections with grassroots governance systems, and expand governance functions in areas such as public service provision, information feedback, and governance assistance. This study provides a resource-based explanation of social organizations’ participation in grid-based governance and offers theoretical implications for promoting multi-actor participation in grassroots governance.
Downloads
References
[1] Wang, H. J. (2022). Institutionalized autonomy: Innovation of villagers’ autonomy toward the modernization of national governance. Journal of Yunnan Minzu University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 39(6), 104–113. [In Chinese.]
[2] Shen, Y. D., Bi, H. R., Yu, J. X., et al. (2025). Research on the action logic, implementation mechanism and policy effects of government funded social organizations. Management World, 41(3), 130–148. [In Chinese.]
[3] Li, J. (2026). “Pecking together”: The transformation dilemma and breakthrough of rare disease social organizations-A case study based on the T Rare Disease Psychological Care Center. China Social Organization Research, 31(1), 240–263, 273–274. [In Chinese.]
[4] Tian, P. J. (2013). Collaborative governance: Theoretical research framework and analytical model [Doctoral dissertation]. Shanghai Jiao Tong University.
[5] Teng, J. X. (2026). The practice and mechanism of social forces’ participation in child welfare provision: A comparative study based on regions with different resource endowments. Social Security Review, 10(3), 89–101. [In Chinese.]
[6] Xu, Y. X., & Cao, G. H. (2016). Historical practice and conceptual analysis of “Three Social Linkage”. Journal of Yunnan Normal University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 48(2), 54–62. [In Chinese.]
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 International Journal of Social Sciences and Public Administration

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.






