Earning Trust through Performance: The Initiation Mechanism of Collaborative Governance in Low-Trust Communities

Authors

  • Yijia Wu School of Public Administration, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610065, China

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62051/ijsspa.v10n8.04

Keywords:

Earning Trust Through Performance, Community Trust, Collaborative Governance, Property Management, Fiduciary Property Management

Abstract

In low-trust communities, residents often expect visible service improvements before paying fees, whereas property management companies require stable revenue expectations before increasing investment. This mutual wait-and-see stance creates a first-mover dilemma. Drawing on the fiduciary property management reform in XH Residential Community in Chengdu, this study uses semi-structured interviews, participant observation, and document analysis to examine how institutional transparency is converted into performance-based trust. The findings show that the reform first reduced uncertainty through a collectively owned fund, open budgeting, and financial oversight. The property management company then assumed initial risk by advancing funds, thereby sending a credible signal of sustained contract performance. Environmental improvements, facility repairs, and public disclosure of results converted institutional commitments into observable governance performance, prompting residents to revise their assessment of the company and respond through fee payment, oversight, and participation. As performance feedback continued, one-off trust building developed into relatively stable expectations of cooperation. The initiation of cooperation in low-trust communities therefore depends not only on transparent rules but also on a mechanism that combines first-bearing of risk with visible performance.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Zhu, B. W., & Xu, W. (2023). Rebuilding trust: Resolving the dilemma of property management enterprises' participation in urban community governance. Jianghan Tribune, (7), 137–144. [In Chinese.]

[2] Chen, P. (2018). The dilemma of property management fees in urban communities and its countermeasures. Administration Reform, (6), 48–53. [In Chinese.]

[3] Wang, Z. Q., & Chen, Q. X. (2019). Causes of and solutions to the dilemma of urban community self governance in China: The evolution of a property management dispute in a residential community. Journal of Shanghai Administration Institute, 20(2), 53–61. [In Chinese.]

[4] Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H., & Schoorman, F. D. (1995). An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 709–734.

[5] Zhu, B. W., & Xu, W. (2023). Rebuilding trust: Resolving the dilemma of property management enterprises' participation in urban community governance. Jianghan Tribune, (7), 137–144. [In Chinese.]

[6] Guo, W. H., & Cheng, B. (2018). The trap of collective identity transformation: Underlying causes of property management difficulties in urban communities during urbanization. New Horizons, (5), 69–74, 122. [In Chinese.]

[7] Zhang, D. W., & Zhao, Y. C. (2023). Responsibility linkage: Mechanisms and practical pathways for sustaining a community governance community: A comparison of old residential community renewal cases. Truth Seeking, (6), 65–78, 109. [In Chinese.]

[8] Ostrom, E. (2012). Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action (X. D. Yu & X. D. Chen, Trans.). Shanghai Translation Publishing House. [Chinese translation.]

[9] Spence, M. (1973). Job market signaling. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 87(3), 355–374.

[10] Ministry of Housing and Urban Rural Development of the People's Republic of China, et al. (2020, December 25). Notice on strengthening and improving residential property management. https://www.gov.cn/zhengce/zhengceku/2021 01/05/content_5577415.htm

Downloads

Published

2026-08-28

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Wu, Y. (2026). Earning Trust through Performance: The Initiation Mechanism of Collaborative Governance in Low-Trust Communities. International Journal of Social Sciences and Public Administration, 10(8), 27-34. https://doi.org/10.62051/ijsspa.v10n8.04