Analysis on the Development of Digital Governance and Collaborative Citizen Participation in the Field of Public Administration
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62051/ijsspa.v10n8.05Keywords:
Digital Governance, Citizen Collaborative Participation, Public Administration, Government-citizen Interaction, Value Co-creationAbstract
Digital technology is continuously changing the operating logic of public administration, and citizen participation in building and running digital governments has been used to measure the effectiveness of government digitalisation. The current development situation of citizen collaborative participation in the field of public administration will be examined through three lenses in this paper: institutional supply, platform support and practical operation. The national integrated government service platform has more than 1.08 billion registered users, and there are a total of 13,440 government websites and 82,151 government new media accounts at all levels in the country. Promptly respond to the public's complaints and enhance other modes of government-citizen communication. The State Council's "Guiding Opinions on Strengthening Digital Government Construction" has listed "prompt response to public complaints" as one of the key new forms of Digital Government Construction. Digital Infrastructure and institutional frameworks have provided the initial support for citizen participation. Obstacles to online participation still exist, data security risks are present, and the efficiency of some platform interactions is relatively low; thus, the scale and depth of collaboration have not been maximized. In the interest of promoting high-quality development of digital governance and citizen participation, efforts should be made to coordinate technological empowerment and institutional innovation, focus on the simultaneous progress of expanding participation channels and improving the effectiveness of participation, manage the relationship between data openness and the limits of privacy protection, and build a governance pattern where technology and institutions work together.
Downloads
References
[1] Zhang, W. T., He, M., & Liu, J. X. (2024, June 1). These numbers witness five years of the national integrated government service platform [4]. People’s Daily Online. http://politics.people.com.cn/n1/2024/0601/c458474 40248134 4.html
[2] Tsinghua University. (2025, December 8). The 2025 online government innovation development report shows that AI large models play a more prominent supporting role. People’s Daily Online. http://politics.people.com.cn/n1/2025/1208/c458474 40619844.html
[3] Osborne, S. P., Radnor, Z., & Strokosch, K. (2016). Co production and the co creation of value in public services: A suitable case for treatment? Public Management Review, 18(5), 639–653. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2015.1111927
[4] Xiang, Y. Q., & Jiang, Y. Q. (2025). Institutional empowerment platform enrichment: The path to achieving citizen cooperative production behaviors in digital government services. Qu Shi, (3), 54–69, 111. [In Chinese.]
[5] Ruijer, E. H., & Martinius, E. (2017). Researching the democratic impact of open government data: A systematic literature review. Information Polity, 22(4), 233–250.
[6] Dalian University of Technology. (n.d.). [Webpage content]. http://sem.dlut.edu.cn/info/1883/16120.htm
[7] Fengyang County Government. (n.d.). [Webpage content]. https://www.fy.gov.cn/Content/show/1175638.html
[8] National Development and Reform Commission of the People’s Republic of China. (2024, November 8). [Webpage content]. http://www.cfgw.net.cn/2024 11/08/content_25115584.html
[9] Zhou, Z. Z., & Ding, M. Q. (2025). The improvement path of public participation mechanism in the context of digital government construction. Journal of Nanning Normal University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 46(2), 121–132. https://doi.org/10.16601/j.cnki.issn2096 7349.2025.02.010. [In Chinese.]
[10] Lember, V., Brandsen, T., & Tõnurist, P. (2019). The potential impacts of digital technologies on co production and co creation. Public Management Review, 21(11), 1665–1686.
[11] Wang, X. L., & Xing, Y. D. (2025). Digital governance and perceived equity of basic public services: Mechanism analysis and empirical test. Journal of Northwest University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 55(1), 106–116. https://doi.org/10.16152/j.cnki.xdxbsk.2025 01 009. [In Chinese.]
[12] Nabatchi, T., Sancino, A., & Sicilia, M. (2017). Varieties of participation in public services: The who, when, and what of coproduction. Public Administration Review, 77(5), 766–776.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 International Journal of Social Sciences and Public Administration

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.






