← Back to Volume 7, Issue 2

More-than-Human Geography: Core Issues and Trends

Lei Wu
Vol.7, No.2, pp.29-43, 2025 DOI: 10.62051/ijsspa.v7n2.05 June 13, 2025
Download PDF
Abstract: In the 21st century, in the trend of ‘returning to materialism’ in Western geography, More-than-Human Geography (MTHG) has emerged as one of the most important ways of exploring the world constituted by human and non-human beings. Through the analysis of relevant journal articles and books, the review finds that there are obvious differences between domestic and international research on MTHG: the West focuses on ecological politics and climate ethics with an ontological revolution as the core, while China focuses on the materialistic turn and localised application. As one of the most groundbreaking theoretical paradigms in human geography in the 21st century, MTHG dissolves the dichotomy between natural determinism and social constructivism, reconstructs the spatial cognitive paradigm of dynamic correlation, and provides a technological and ethical framework for cross-species collaboration in urban planning and ecological restoration.
Keywords: More-than-Human Geography, New Materialism, Materiality Turn, Nature-Society, Non-Human Subjects
APA Citation: Lei Wu (2025). More-than-Human Geography: Core Issues and Trends. International Journal of Social Sciences and Public Administration, 7(2), 29-43. https://doi.org/10.62051/ijsspa.v7n2.05

References

  1. Castree Noel, Nash Catherine. “Introduction: Posthumanism in question.” Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, Vol. 36, No. 8, pp. 1341–1348, 2004. https://doi.org/10.1068/a37168
  2. Whatmore Sarah. “Materialist returns: Practising cultural geography in and for a more-than-human world.” Cultural Geographies, Vol. 13, No. 4, pp. 600–609, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1191/1474474006cgj377oa
  3. Bennett Judith. Vibrant Matter: A Political Ecology of Things. Durham: Duke University Press, 2010, pp. 1–232. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv111jh6w
  4. Braun Bruce. “Environmental issues: Inventive life.” Progress in Human Geography, Vol. 32, No. 5, pp. 667–679, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132507088030
  5. Lorimer Jamie. “Probiotic environmentalities: Rewilding with wolves and worms.” Theory, Culture & Society, Vol. 34, No. 4, pp. 27–48, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276417695866
  6. Lu Wei, Yin Duo, Zhu Hong. “The progress of more-than-human geographies in Western geography.” Acta Geographica Sinica, Vol.74, No.10, pp.2178–2191, 2019.https://www.rdfybk.com/CN/lexeme/showArticleByLexeme.do?articleID=46537
  7. Latour Bruno. “Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory”, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2005, pp. 1–301. https://global.oup.com/academic/product/reassembling-the-social-9780199256051
  8. Latour Bruno. “We Have Never Been Modern”, Longman, London, 1993, pp.1–157. https://www.hup.harvard.edu/books/9780674948396
  9. Greenhough Beth. “Vitalist Geographies: Life and the More-than-Human”, Routledge, Abingdon, 2016, pp. 1–218. https://www.routledge.com/Vitalist-Geographies/Greenhough/p/book/9781138647527
  10. Thrift Nigel. “Non-Representational Theory: Space, Politics, Affect”, Routledge, Abingdon, 2008, pp. 1–336. https://www.routledge.com/Non-Representational-Theory-Space-Politics-Affect/Thrift/p/book/9780415307718
  11. Hinchliffe, Steve, Matthew B. Kearnes, Monica Degen, Sarah Whatmore. “Urban wild things: A cosmopolitical experiment.” Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, Vol. 23, No. 5, pp. 643–658, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1068/d351t
  12. Whatmore Sarah. “Hybrid Geographies: Natures Cultures Spaces”, SAGE Publications, London, 2002, pp. 1–208. https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/hybrid-geographies/book211986
  13. Carey Mark. “In the Shadow of Melting Glaciers: Climate Change and Andean Society”, Oxford University Press, New York, 2010, pp. 1–288. https://global.oup.com/academic/product/in-the-shadow-of-melting-glaciers-9780195396065
  14. Kitchin Rob, Dodge Martin. “Code/Space: Software and Everyday Life”, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 2011, pp. 1–304. https://mitpress.mit.edu/9780262015080/code-space/
  15. Gandy Matthew. The Fabric of Space: Water, Modernity, and the Urban Imagination. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2014, pp. 1–352 . https://www.rdfybk.com//9780262028257/the-fabric-of-space/
  16. Beth Greenhough. “More-than-human Geographies”, in The SAGE Handbook of Human Geography, edited by Roger Lee, Noel Castree, Rob Kitchin, Victoria Lawson, Anssi Paasi, Chris Philo, Sarah Radcliffe, Susan M. Roberts, and Charles W. J. Withers, SAGE Publications, London, pp. 94–119, 2014. https://www.rdfybk.com//10.4135/9781446247617.n5
  17. Buller Henry. “Animal geographies I.” Progress in Human Geography, Vol. 38, No. 2, pp. 308–318, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132513486220
  18. Hodgetts, Timothy, Jamie Lorimer. “Methodologies for animals’ geographies: Cultures, communication and genomics.” Cultural Geographies, Vol. 22, No. 2, pp. 285–295, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474474014525114
  19. Srinivasan, Krithika. “Conservation biopolitics and the sustainability episteme.” Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, Vol. 49, No. 7, pp. 1458–1476, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518X17702693
  20. McKiernan, Shaun, Lesley Instone. “From pest to partner: Rethinking the Australian white ibis in the more-than-human city.” Cultural Geographies, Vol. 23, No. 3, pp. 475–494, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474474015590671
  21. Van Patter Lauren E. “Individual animal geographies for the more-than-human city: Storying synanthropy and cynanthropy with urban coyotes.” Environment and Planning E: Nature and Space, Vol. 5, No. 4, pp. 2216–2239, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1177/25148486221079458
  22. Gibbs Leah. “Animal geographies III: Relational and political.” Progress in Human Geography, Vol. 48, No. 5, pp. 677–687, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1177/03091325221117907
  23. Hodgetts Timothy, Lorimer Jamie. “More-than-Human: A Companion”, Taylor & Francis, London, 2024, pp. 1–244. https://www.routledge.com/More-than-Human-A-Companion/Hodgetts-Lorimer/p/book/9781032062047
  24. Robertson S A. “Rethinking relational ideas of place in more-than-human cities.” Geography Compass, Vol. 12, No. 4, e12367, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1111/gec3.12367
  25. Steele Wendy, Ilan Wiesel, Cecily Maller. “More-than-human cities: Where the wild things are.”Geoforum, Vol. 106, pp. 411–415, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2019.09.007
  26. Ernwein Marion. “Bringing urban parks to life: The more-than-human politics of urban ecological work.” Annals of the American Association of Geographers, Vol. 111, No. 2, pp. 559–576, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1080/24694452.2020.1795754
  27. Sheikh Hira, Peta Mitchell, Marcus Foth. “More-than-human city-region foresight: Multispecies entanglements in regional governance and planning.” Regional Studies, Vol. 57, No. 4, pp. 642–655, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2022.2131447
  28. Choi Jaz Hee-jeong, Kit Braybrooke, Laura Forlano. “Care-full co-curation: Critical urban placemaking for more-than-human futures.” Cities, Vol. 132, 103955, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2022.103955
  29. Maller Cecily. “Re-orienting nature-based solutions with more-than-human thinking.” Cities, Vol. 113, 103155, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2021.103155
  30. Sharp Emma L., Gary J. Brierley, Jennifer Salmond, Nicolas Lewis. “Geoethical futures: A call for more-than-human physical geography.” Environment and Planning F: Philosophy, Theory, Models, Methods and Practice, Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 66–81, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1177/26349825211062708
  31. Couper Pauline R. “The embodied spatialities of being in nature: Encountering the nature/culture binary in green/blue space.” Cultural Geographies, Vol. 25, No. 2, pp. 285–299, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474474017705133
  32. Judge Sara M. “Languages of sensing: Bringing neurodiversity into more-than-human geography.” Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, Vol. 36, No. 6, pp. 1101–1119, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263775818799741
  33. Oliver Catherine. "Dancing with foxes: More‐than‐human design in ‘the chicken city’." Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 50.2 (2025): e12695. https://doi.org/10.1111/tran.12695
  34. Marković Ivan.“Out of place, out of time: Towards a more-than-human rhythmanalysis of smoking.” Cultural Geographies, Vol. 26, No. 4, pp. 487–503, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474474019830673
  35. Andrews Gavin J. “Health geographies II: The posthuman turn.” Progress in Human Geography, Vol. 43, No. 6, pp. 1109–1119, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132518765608
  36. Blue Gwendolyn, Rock Melanie. “Genomic trans-biopolitics: Why more-than-human geography is critical amid the COVID-19 pandemic.” Dialogues in Human Geography, Vol. 10, No. 2, pp. 287–290, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1177/2043820620935252
  37. Jackson Paul, Neely Abigail H. “Triangulating health: Toward a practice of a political ecology of health.” Progress in Human Geography, Vol. 39, No. 1, pp. 47–64, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132514527031
  38. Lorimer Jamie. “Worlding and weirding with beaver: A more-than-human political ecology of ecosystem engineering.” Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, e12698, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1111/tran.12698
  39. Maller Cecily. Re-orienting nature-based solutions with more-than-human thinking[J]. Cities, 2021, 113: 103155.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2021.103155
  40. Brown Katrina M, Frode Flemsæter, Katrina Rønningen. “More-than-human geographies of property: Moving towards spatial justice with response-ability.” Geoforum, Vol. 99, pp. 54–62, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2018.11.009
  41. Margulies Jared D, Brock Bersaglio. “Furthering post-human political ecologies.” Geoforum, Vol. 94, pp. 103–106, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2018.05.005
  42. GUO Wen. Research on new materialism in cultural geography[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2023, 78(12): 2922-2938 https://doi.org/10.11821/dlxb202312002
  43. WANG Min, JIANG Ronghao, ZHU Hong. “Non-representational”, “re-materializing” and the research methods of new cultural geography[J]. Progress in Geography, 2019, 38(2): 153-163 https://doi.org/10.18306/dlkxjz.2019.02.001
  44. Yin Duo, Gao Quan, Lu Wei, et al.“Construction and consumption of Lijiang Old Town from the perspective of more-than-human geography.”Tourism Tribune, Vol. 36, No. 4, pp. 96–105, 2021. https://doi.org/10.19765/j.cnki.1002-5006.2021.04.011
  45. Zhao Yizheng, Chen Pinyu, Kong Xiang. “Progress and reflection on consumption geography from the perspective of new materialism.” Progress in Geography, Vol. 40, No. 8, pp. 1419–1429, 2021. https://www.rdfybk.com//EN/lexeme/showArticleByLexeme.do?articleID=50253
  46. Guo Wen. “The origin, connotation, and significance of the new paradigm of Western social and cultural geography.” Geographical Research, Vol. 39, No. 3, 2020. https://doi.org/10.11821/dlyj020190097
  47. Sun Jiaojiao, Lü Xingyang, Li Yaoqi, et al. “Economic geography perspectives on pet phenomena: Multiple topics and innovative directions.” Economic Geography, Vol. 42, No. 7, pp. 1–10, 2022. https://doi.org/10.15957/j.cnki.jjdl.2022.07.001
  48. Cheng Li, Wang Yunlang, Shang Yufei, et al. “Complexity of pet leisure participation from the perspective of leisure constraint.” Human Geography, Vol. 40, No. 1, pp. 26–36, 2021. http://rwdl.xisu.edu.cn/CN/10.13959/j.issn.1003-2398.2025.01.004
  49. Huang Huizhu, Zhang Min, Chen Peipei. “Caring practices of urban nature: Space, relations and behavior in zoos.”Human Geography, Vol. 38, No. 5, pp. 98–106, 2023. https://www.rdfybk.com//CN/10.13959/j.issn.1003-2398.2023.05.012
  50. Zhang Yufen, Wang Qiang, Chen Yufeng. “Traveling with pets: Connotation, characteristics and its analysis from the perspective of new materialism.” World Regional Studies, Vol. 33, No. 11, 2024. https://www.rdfybk.com//CN/10.3969/j.issn.1004-9479.2024.11.20230059
  51. Huang Yuling, An Ning, Zhang Bo. “Rethinking the Relationship between Microbes, Bodies and Cities from the Perspective of Mobilities.” Tropical Geography, Vol. 44, No. 9, 2024. https://www.rdfybk.com//10.13284/j.cnki.rddl.20230439
  52. TANG Maolin, LU Pin, LIU Maosong. “Unity of Geography beyond Dichotomy of Physical and Human Geography.” Tropical Geography, Vol.30, No.2, pp.101–107,120, 2010. https://www.rdfybk.com//CN/Y2010/V30/I2/101
  53. WEI Jun-feng, MING Qing-zhong. “SOCIAL NATURE: THE LINEAGE AND PROSPECTS OF RESEARCH ON THE SOCIAL CONSTRUCTION OF NATURE.” Human Geography, Vol. 40, No. 1, pp. 18–25, 2025. http://rwdl.xisu.edu.cn/CN/10.13959/j.issn.1003-2398.2025.01.003
  54. Shangyi Zhou. “On the Basis of the Integration of Physical Geography and Human Geography: A Response to the Article by Christian Kesteloot and Lorenzo Bagnoli.” Tropical Geography, 2023, pp. 1–4. https://www.rddl.com.cn/CN/abstract/abstract55867.shtml
  55. Cheng Yeqing, Hu Shougeng, Yang Ren, et al. “Protection and utilization of traditional Chinese villages towards rural revitalization: Challenges and prospects.” Journal of Natural Resources, Vol. 39, No. 8, pp. 1735–1759, 2024. https://doi.org/10.31497/zrzyxb.20240801
  56. HUANG Xiang. “THE CHILDREN-NATURE RELATIONSHIP: CONTACT, COGNIZATION AND EMOTION” Human Geography, Vol. 35, No. 6, pp. 9–17, 2020. https://www.rdfybk.com//CN/10.13959/j.issn.1003-2398.2020.06.002
  57. WEI Lei, ZHU Hong. “The translocal practices of intangible cultural heritage in the perspective of geography.” Acta Geographica Sinica, Vol. 77, No. 2, 2022. https://www.geog.com.cn/article/2022/0375-5444/0375-5444-77-2-492.shtml
  58. LI Lei-lei, REN Jun. “URBAN VILLAGE AS URBAN HERITAGE:PUBLIC GEOGRAPHIES AND A CASE STUDY OF SHENZHEN.” Human Geography, Vol. 32, No. 5, pp. 33–39, 2017. http://rwdl.xisu.edu.cn/CN/10.13959/j.issn.1003-2398.2017.05.005
  59. SUN Jiaojiao, HU Hongji, GUO Yingzhi. “Spatial Distribution and Influencing Factors of Urban Pet Hospitals: A Case Study of Shanghai.” Economic Geography, Vol. 44, No. 3, pp. 86–96, 2024. https://www.rdfybk.com//CN/lexeme/showArticleByLexeme.do?articleID=69328