Regulation of Privacy Policies: A Perspective from Public Law Protection of Personal Information

Download PDF
Abstract: Online platforms process personal data through privacy policies while pledging to protect users' personal information. Although derived from traditional privacy concepts, privacy policies differ significantly in nature-personal information protection carries stronger public law attributes, rendering privacy policies primarily compliance instruments that should integrate both self-regulation and government regulation approaches. With the rapid expansion of platforms' private power, privacy policies, despite their enhanced role, have exhibited alienating effects: failures in self-regulation, erosion of user rights, and circumvention of governmental oversight. To address these issues, a meta-regulatory approach is imperative, requiring tripartite collaboration among platforms, users, and regulatory authorities to refine privacy policy frameworks.
Keywords: Privacy Policy, Personal Information Protection, Self-Regulation, Government Regulation
APA Citation: Xiangrui Zhao (2025). Regulation of Privacy Policies: A Perspective from Public Law Protection of Personal Information. International Journal of Social Sciences and Public Administration, 8(1), 70-82. https://doi.org/10.62051/ijsspa.v8n1.09

References

  1. Chengfeng Yu, “The Rise of Platform Media: Paradigms and Paradoxes of Privacy Protection”, Oriental Law, No. 5, pp. 75, 2024.
  2. Hanhua Zhou, “Parallel or Intersecting: The Relationship Between Personal Information Protection and Privacy Rights”, Peking University Law Journal, Vol. 33, No. 5:pp. 1169, 2021.
  3. Xinbao Zhang, “From Privacy to Personal Information: Rebalancing Interests in Theory and Institutions”, China Legal Science, No. 3, pp. 43, 2015.
  4. Huanxin Luo, “Privacy Policy's Past, Present, and Future: From Contract to Standard to Trust Endorsement”, Nanjing University Law Journal, No. 5, pp. 104, 2023.
  5. Yegang Wang, “Study on the Legal Effect of the Internet Privacy Policy: Centered on Personal information Protection”, Journal of Comparative Law, No, 1, pp 122, 2020.
  6. Bartle, I., & Vass, P, “Self-Regulation Within The Regulatory State: Towards A New Regulatory Paradigm?”, Public Administration, Vol.85, No.4, pp.888-890, 2007.
  7. Djumadi, Abdul Halim Barkatullah, “Does self-regulation provide legal protection and security to e-commerce consumers?”, Electronic Commerce Research and Applications. Vol. 30, July–August, p. 97, 2018.
  8. Song Jin, "Practice Review and Normative Approach of Mobile APP Privacy Policy", Tianjin Legal Science, No. 3, pp. 79, 2024.
  9. Huanxin Luo, “Privacy Policy's Past, Present, and Future: From Contract to Standard to Trust Endorsement”, Nanjing University Law Journal, No. 5, pp. 114, 2023.
  10. Jack M. Balkin, “Information Fiduciaries and the First Amendment”, UC Davis Law Review, Vol. 49, No. 4, pp. 1183, 2016.
  11. Jack M. Balkin, “The Fiduciary Model of Privacy”, Harvard Law Review Forum, Vol. 134, No. 1, pp. 26, 2020.
  12. Siqi Lu, “Application of Information Fiduciary Duty in Platform Organization Under the Theory of Meta-regulation”, Electronics Intellectual Property, No. 5, pp. 17, 2022.
  13. Mengyao Hu, “Theoretical Reflection and Paradigm Reconstruction of Social Self-regulation”, Law Review, No. 6, pp. 42, 2024.